Updates
Home / Current Affairs / New Imam Bill makes Islam a Crime

New Imam Bill makes Islam a Crime

With an upcoming law targeting Muslim imams, preachers and lecturers, Denmark is now leading the way in Europe with far-reaching anti-Muslim laws. The so-called “Imam package” is defined by significant totalitarian features usually seen in the most infamous police states. Are we witnessing the reemergence of totalitarianism in Europe?     

Political pioneering has never quite characterised Danish politics. Throughout the last few centuries, domestic and economic policies have been copied almost directly from Denmark’s big neighbouring states: Germany, France and Britain. From Bismarck’s welfare state to Thatcher’s revival of raw Capitalism, the same changes in Central and Western Europe eventually happen in Denmark, but with a delay of some years or even decades.

The same lack of originality is found in Danish foreign policy which has always been defined by the world’s current major powers. It supported France when Napoleon peaked in power until the British bombardment of Copenhagen in 1807, which changed Copenhagen’s loyalty from Paris to London. Denmark, unlike Norway, pledged its allegiance to Berlin when Nazi Germany looked like it was winning the war until Hitler’s devastating loss in Stalingrad consequently made Denmark a British ally again.

The newly appointed Danish foreign minister, Anders Samuelsen, was asked recently about his vision for Danish foreign policy to which he plainly answered: “my vision is to do what the US tells us to do”.[1] The same pathetic answer could really have come from any Danish foreign minister since the beginning of the Cold War when America became the world’s leading superpower.

Similarly, when security and integration politics were fused together by Western governments after 9/11, Denmark became even more eager to “learn” from its big neighbours. The so-called counter terrorism laws and prevent strategies of Britain is mirrored by the policies in Denmark. The “tough on Muslims” rhetoric from French and Dutch politicians is echoed in Denmark, not only from the right-wing, but from labour and socialist parties as well.

Leading the way

It is very unusual for Denmark to lead in anything but with the upcoming Imam Bill, it is happening nevertheless. “Leading” is usually associated with doing something good; however, in this case it could be argued that leading is not always a virtue. “The Imam Package”, as it is called, contains elements more far-reaching than any other law passed in Europe since 9/11.

A majority of the Danish parliament, including leftwing and socialist parties, agreed to the bill in June this year, and it is expected to be passed at the beginning of the coming year. The declared aim of the bill is to fight “religious preachers who seek to undermine Danish values and law”.[2]  The Imam Bill will make it a criminal offence to “explicitly condone any of the specific acts such as stoning, flogging, physical punishment of children, cutting of hands, circumcision of women, forced marriage and polygamy” i.e. what they deem sharia-law.

Violation of the law can result in 3 years of imprisonment as a maximum sentence. If a secular liberal condones polygamy, he or she is exempted from the law as it only targets “religious” consent and not opinions argued in a “democratic” fashion. Similarly, the right wing MP, Marie Krarup, will not be subject to the law even though she calls for physical punishment of children because she expresses her opinions within the democratic framework.

Far-reaching

Hence, a Muslim preacher or lecturer can be imprisoned for 3 years for saying: “I believe in polygamy, because the Qur’ān allows it.”

The criminalisation of religious and political convictions is not the only extreme aspect of this bill. It even prohibits these views to be expressed in “private” circumstances using the example of a “confidential” conversation of a person who seeks advice from a “religious preacher”.

It also mentions opinions expressed on Facebook and religious magazines as examples as well as a “political debate, which initially is not subjected to the law”. However, this debate could change its nature to become “religious teaching” and therefore “becomes included in the criminalisation”.

Public reactions

Several public figures have expressed their resentment of the law.

The Dean of the People’s University of Copenhagen, Bente Hagelund, said regarding the bill

“it is evident by the motives that the bill targets legal, but unpopular statements. Honestly, it is hypocritical of us to yell about equality and human rights while discriminating between the organisations we like and those we don’t like.”[3]

The Vice Director of the Institute of Human Rights, Louise Holck, commented on the bill by saying: “to criminalise something said in a private circle is extremely far-reaching”.[4] A similar reaction came from Lisbet Christoffersen, Professor in Public Law from the University of Roskilde, who considered the bill to pose “a serious change in Danish religious law practice”.[5] Jacob Mchangama, Director of think tank Justitia, criticised the law for criminalising views which do not encourage violence.[6]

Christians and Jews need not worry

The Danish government has not done much to hide its true agenda. When the general secretary of the Danish Baptist Church objected to the law, Danish Minister of Culture and Church, Bertel Haarder, was quick to calm them down by assuring the law was not “casting suspicion on religion generally” but was targeting “imams”.[7]

In other words, it is not targeting religions in general but one specific religion. The Imam Bill itself mentions that it would be unconstitutional to limit the law to target one single religion or religious group, and therefore religious preachers must be referred to in a general way in the bill.

Messy business

Things can become messy when a small time state tries to lead. The legal think tank Justitia wrote an eighteen page report arguing the Imam Bill violates The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) as it fails to live up to the qualitative and proportional requirements of the ECHR.[8]

Indeed, the Danish parliament does not seem to have thoroughly thought things through. The bill itself was a swift reaction to a 6-series Islamophobic documentary called “Mosques behind the veil” starring a member of Council of Ex-Muslims, Nahla Mahmoud, who is well-known for her anti-Muslim sentiments. Its distorted display of Danish mosques subjected the documentary to harsh criticism from communication experts such as Professor Vibeke Bor­berg and PhD Christian Suhr.[9]

Two months after this so-called documentary aired, a majority of parties in the parliament agreed to the new bill. In many countries laws are made after a thorough and comprehensive study of data material, expert commissions and long term experiences. In Denmark laws are made in response to documentaries. Even more extraordinary is that the Imam Bill itself mentions the documentary as the reason behind the bill.

Champions of free speech?

Quite ironically, for the last decade Danish politicians have portrayed themselves as champions of free speech. Globally, the Cartoon Crisis is viewed as a disgrace and harassment towards Muslims. In Denmark, however, it is seen as a great noble battle for free speech which Denmark eventually won.

The Cartoon Crisis, of course, had nothing to do with free speech but was a result of an encouragement to Danish newspapers, from the Danish Minister of Culture, Brian Mikkelsen, to deride Islamic symbols after a Danish artist refused to urinate on the Qur’ān.[10] The same ministry, by the way, forgot everything about free speech when it threatened the director of Denmark’s Loyal Library as he refused to cancel a political conference about Afghanistan held by a Muslim organisation, Hizb ut-Tahrir.[11]

Just like the Cartoon Crisis, the Imam Bill exposes Denmark’s anti-Muslim agenda and hypocritical policies. With policies such as the Swiss “handshake” law and the burqini ban in France, European countries in general are looking more and more like reemerging medieval police states. The Imam Bill is very unlikely to cause a drop of support to the Sharia. However, liberals’ confidence in their own values might have suffered quite the drop.

Source: www.islam21c.com

Notes:

[1] Danmarks Radio, Debatten, 1-12-2016

[2] http://www.ft.dk/samling/20161/lovforslag/l18/html_som_fremsat.htm

[3] http://www.bentehagelund.dk/blog/

[4] http://nyheder.tv2.dk/politik/2016-08-11-lov-mod-hadpraedikanter-moder-kritik-for-at-vaere-uklar

[5] http://politiken.dk/kultur/article5632406.ece

[6] Justitia Report on Imam Bill, 11/8-2016

[7] http://www.kristeligt-dagblad.dk/danmark/baptister-vil-kappe-baand-til-staten-paa-grund-af-imamlov

[8] Justitia Report on Imam Bill, 11/8-2016

[9] http://www.b.dk/nationalt/lydfil-rejser-debat-om-udeladte-oplysninger-i-tv-2s-moske-dokumentar

[10] Speech at the National Assembly of the Conservative party, 25/9-2005 http://www.b.dk/danmark/269-2005-minister-kalder-til-ny-kulturkamp

[11] TV2, 30/12-2010 http://nyheder.tv2.dk/article.php/id-36174792:per-stig-m%C3%B8ller-ind-i-sag-om-islamistm%C3%B8de.html

About Dr Taimullah Abu-Laban

Dr Taimullah has been active as a Muslim writer and lecturer in Denmark throughout the last decade. His writings usually deal with political and cultural issues related to Muslims in Europe and in the Middle East. He chairs a committee in a large Muslim organization dedicated to building strong ties between Muslim organizations, and connecting with influential non-Muslim thinkers, activists and politicians as well. The youth wings of Denmark’s various political parties invite him frequently for lectures and debates.

4 comments

  1. The refusal to include Sharia law into British criminal law does not “make criminals” of people using Sharia courts, as long as the decisions of the courts are not in contravention of British criminal law.
    For example , if a women sues for divorce in a Sharia court freely, without family or community coercion, the result will be valid as long as the results of the divorce do not break British law. If it does, then the couple can stay separated but they cannot expect the financial and other support that a British divorce would have brought them. They can’t have it both ways. Nobody is going to lock them up, but there cannot be one law for one group, (except in tiny areas like halal or Kosher meat or Sikh headgear) and one for the rest, as it would bring about the sort of dysfunctionality and conflict we see in most Muslim countries.

  2. The new Danish law, if consisting of the points mentioned by the writer, is in my opinion justified in the context of Islam’s suppressing of counter-Islamic activity in Moslem countries, eg the excuse of “insulting the Koran” used to kill people in many Islamic lands., thus preventing challenges to this ancient text.

    I do have doubts about one clause, namely forbidding the corporal punishment of children, because I believe it should be the right of parents to punish their children in this way if it is unavoidable, but only lightly and NOT for indoctrination of ANY religion, as opposed to intelligent discussion and mutual respect.

    The reason that Islam has so many problems is because it is prevented by harsh measures from having a reformation to fit it for the modern world.

  3. Assalam o alaikum

    I never see any criticism of Muslim leaders or nations on here. Why always attacking the West while enjoying the freedom of it???

    Why don’t you criticize this

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/saudi-royal-family-gave-681m-to-malaysian-pm-who-banned-shia-islam/5504643

    We Muslims will not taste justice until we treat the world with Justice. Be just, even if it goes against yourselves. Surly that is closer to righteousness.

    We treat minorities like trash in our countries, but when we come to the West, we complain about pathetic restrictions.

    • Tabish Faraaz

      Another comment frm yet another muslim enslaved by the west!! You probably don even know wht u r talkn abt! Have been to UAE, Oman, Malaysia, Kuwait etc… probably nt,these countries treat the westerners like VIPs cuz of their slavery to the west nd give to every citizen of the Western countries on arrival VISAs and they have total freedom their to go to the churches nd live as they want. But a someone like you will then rant about Saudi Arabia nd hw they are forced to cover without known tht even in there, these people cn live in seperate colonies. Nd there are plenty of european countries who hv clearly said tht they wont entertain Islam as a religion
      But defeatists like you dont have a problem with tht, u will hv a problem with nt hvn a church in Saudi

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Verify *

DON'T MISS OUT!
Subscribe To Newsletter
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
Stay Updated
Give it a try, you can unsubscribe anytime.
close-link
Subscribe for Updates or Support Us