Authors - About - Archive - Contact - Donate - Write
Home / Current Affairs / Europe’s Problem of Rape Against Women

Europe’s Problem of Rape Against Women

One in 10 women has experienced some form of sexual violence since the age of 15, and one in 20 has been raped.

31 % of women have experienced one or more acts of physical violence since the age of 15.

Only 14 % of women reported their most serious incident of intimate partner violence to the police.

Of women who have been raped by their current partner, about one third (31 %) have experienced six or more incidents of rape by their partner.

You may think that these facts and statistics were from some distant, far-away  land inhabited my people who are “foreign”; who look different, a people who are “known” to oppress women in countries such as Afghanistan or Pakistan or maybe Saudi Arabia, each of which have a sizeable Muslim population. After all, it is well known isn’t it that domestic violence is a Muslim issue? Well, I can assure you that the above statistics are from the findings of a report published in Brussels last week entitled “Violence against women: an EU-wide Survey”, based on interviews with 42,000 women across 28 EU member states[1]

The survey shows that violence against women is “an extensive human rights abuse” across Europe with one in three women reporting some form of physical or sexual abuse since the age of 15 and 8% suffering abuse in the last 12 months, according to the largest survey of its kind on the issue. In three countries often praised for their gender equality, for example, high numbers of women report suffering violence since the age of 15: in Denmark 52%, Finland 47%, and Sweden 46% of women say they have suffered physical or sexual violence. The UK reports the joint fifth highest incidence of physical and sexual violence (44%), whereas women in Poland report the lowest (19%).

The survey found that abuse, particularly domestic violence, remains socially permissible if it is kept in the private sphere. In fact, legal decisions from the European Court of Human Rights have found that domestic violence is treated as a private dispute between partners in many European countries, not a public matter requiring government interference and prosecution[2].

It is clear that violence against women is not receiving enough attention in most European countries and instead, it is ignored, often typecast as endemic to other parts of the world as suggested at the outset of this article. All the while, abuse against women has been persisting and thriving on European soil. Whenever the issue of domestic violence or indeed violence in general against women is discussed, it is often done so in relation to its purported association with ‘religion’ and more often than not, with a particular slight on the Islamic faith. Unfortunately, false logic can at times seem plausible, and even outright lies repeated often enough begin to sound like the truth. Sadly, when this happens, stereotypes and rumours replace facts, and knowledge is replaced with ignorance and misperception, and ignorance fuels hatred and bigotry.

The alleged relationship between Islām and domestic violence has become so normalised that sadly some Muslims themselves have unfortunately bought into this concept that domestic violence is an issue which Muslims in particular must deal with, as if it is a crime which is monopolised by Muslims only in the same way concepts such as “extremism” and “terrorism” are also widely and wrongly accepted as being Muslim-only crimes. The question which the survey naturally highlights is: which religious values are responsible for driving the current spate of violence against women in Europe given that as recently as 2007, Muslims were found to only amount to 3.2%[3] of Europe’s population? Although the largest religion in Europe is Christianity, it is clear that the predominant spiritual guide in Europe is that of Capitalism and Secularism whose sole focus is material productivity rather than in the training of human beings, because material production is considered to be more important, more valuable and more honourable than the development of human character. Such a civilisation has often been branded as being “morally bankrupt” or indeed “backward” from the human point of view with the concept of greed at the heart of all that it stands for.

In an Islamic society for example, the family system and the relationship between the sexes determine the whole character of a society and whether it is backward or civilised. If the family is the basis of the society, the basis of the family is the division of labour between husband and wife, and the upbringing of children is one of the most important functions of the family; such a society according to an Islamic viewpoint is indeed civilised. In the Islamic system of life, this kind of a family provides the environment under which human values and morals develop and grow in the new generation; these values and morals cannot exist apart from the family unit. If, on the other hand, “free” sexual relationships and illegitimate children become the basis of a society, and if the relationship between man and woman is based on material lust, passion and impulse, it is seen as more meritorious to become engaged in work, for example, at the expense of safeguarding the family unit, then such a system is seen as fundamentally flawed from an Islamic viewpoint. This, as well as the dehumanisation of women as attractive commodities to market material objects becoming more and more widespread, is likely to be contributing to such high levels of violence against women in Europe.

Such societies which give ascendance to physical desires and animalistic morals cannot be considered “civilised” in terms of human development, no matter how much progress they may make in industry or science. In all modern societies, the meaning of ‘morality’ is limited to such an extent that all those aspects which distinguish man from animal are considered beyond its sphere. In these societies, illegitimate sexual relationships are not considered immoral. The practical meaning of ethics is limited to economic affairs or sometimes to political affairs which fall into the category of ‘government interests’. Many scandals are not considered serious by members of society because of sexual immorality and deviations but rather, they are glamorised almost for their gossip value because of the individuals involved. If in a society immoral teachings are rampant, and sexual activity is considered outside the sphere of morality, then in that society the humanity of man can hardly find a place to develop and perceptions of woman seen as mere objects will continue. In an age where to sell anything from fruit to cars requires women appearing in sexually suggestive ways and where even the very people leading the country themselves perpetuate this problem further such in the UK where MPs, peers and their staff were found to be accessing pornography websites hundreds of thousands of times in Parliament[4], it is thus asserted that Islamic values and morals, Islamic teachings and safeguards, are worthy of at least closer reflection for solving Europe’s current problems. Considering this unchanging and true measure of human progress, where a man’s relationship with a woman is regulated by the Divine guidance from al-Khāliq, the Creator, Islām is more than capable of resolving such a worrying trend developing in Europe by providing them with a truly civilised model which is not measured through the prism of material worth.

Finally, it is hoped that our Muslim brethren who have fallen prey to thinking domestic violence is a problem which Muslims must take ownership of, understand that Muslims are not only against domestic violence but are against all forms of unlawful violence. They should also not be afraid to remind those who live in glass houses to refrain from throwing stones. The one pointing his/her finger at the Muslims should remember that when pointing, three fingers remain pointing at themselves as is abundantly evident from the survey. Those Muslims that have an inferiority complex when it comes to looking up to Europeans by default for a benchmark for “progress” should also reflect and ponder over what kind of society we really want to live in.



DISCLAIMER: All material found on is for free and is for information purposes only. All material may be freely copied & shared on condition that it is clearly attributed to [hyperlinked] as the original source. The views expressed on this site or on any linked sites do not necessarily represent those of

About Z A Rahman

Z.A Rahman is a community activist and a member of a large Mosque in the UK. He graduated in Law, specialising in discrimination law and now works for a leading national company. He has a keen interest in politics and history, particularly Islamic history. He also enjoys traveling and has visited numerous countries in the Middle East and North Africa.


  1. Indeed. These corrupt and evil western societies could deal with the problem easily by simply making the rape victims the criminals and stoning them to death for adultery or they could say the women were asking for it because they hadn’t covered their hands and have them whipped for debauchery.
    And if they made it a man’s religious duty to beat up his disobedient wife then the problem of domestic violence would simply go away. These silly infidels eh? When will they learn?

    • I am going to take a wild guess and presume you actually are unaware that those are in fact embarrassing Biblical injunctions. Muslims don’t believe in the Bible, kid. Another routine, lazy generalisation and presumptuous supplanting of western history on a tradition not riddled with the same mistakes.

      Of course, if these ‘infidels’ of which you speak completed the steps their ancestors made in trying to mimic the exalted ethical and legal standards of the sharia then that might go some way towards mitigating some of these issues. (Google the essay ‘The Islamic origins of the English Common Law’ by John Makdisi)

      • And I’m going to take a wild guess and presume you work for Islam 21c. Hence the near instantaneous response to my post which was the first made on this article in over six months.
        I deal with reality. What’s happening in the world today – not 1400 odd years ago.
        Look, you do not have to mindlessly accept the supremacist nonsense you are obviously being force-fed. Educate yourself, learn all sides of the story and make your own judgment based on what you think, not what others tell you.
        God gave you a brain, he expects you to use it.
        Ask yourself honestly – would you want the life of a woman in Saudi Arabia? Thought not.

        • Firstly, sorry to burst another bubble but I get email notifications when anyone comments as I have subscribed to feeds on certain pages all over the internet. I come across trolls like yourself all the time and relish breaking their ideology-bubbles based on empirical facts and peer reviewed research.

          Secondly, how do you propose I ‘educate’ myself on both sides of the so-called story? I delight in the irony of someone who is clearly pushing a bigoted, misinformed, ideological, far-right media narrative (hence your ridiculous question about being a woman in Saudi Arabia clearly devoid of any statistical significance but anti-Arab propaganda), accusing the person who directed them to peer reviewed academic research to broaden their perspective, of being ill-informed!

          You couldn’t write such comedy material if you tried!

          • Crikey, I shudder to think what other things a guy like you ‘relishes’ doing in his spare time.
            How does one subscribe to feeds on random pages on the internet by the way? You and I both know you’re lying.
            I’m afraid the odious rantings of hate-mongering preachers, who I assume are the ‘peers’ you refer to, do not constitute facts.
            Therefore I would propose you educate yourself by reading or listening to something other than twisted, supremacist drivel.
            Perhaps have a look at the country by country reports from Amnesty International focusing on the treatment of women.
            Even the most ludicrous conspiracy theorist would find it hard to describe Amnesty International as a ‘far-right’ group.
            The status of women in Saudi Arabia is well known. The facts are well documented. If they reflect badly on Arabs that does not make them propaganda or any less true.
            Personally I don’t have anything against Arabs or Muslims in general – they’re simply fellow human beings to me.
            I do however have strong dislike for supremacists regardless of whether they are white, black, Islamic, Christian or otherwise.
            In my view you lot are all the same. The average knuckle-dragging EDL supporter is little different to the average frothing-at-the-mouth Islamist lunatic.
            Were they mixed up at birth they would probably have followed exactly the same paths.
            The character profiles are identical – low intelligence, angry, frustrated, self-righteous, bigoted, often violent, easily-led and generally under-achieving in life.
            So I say again: Ask yourself honestly – would you want the life of a woman in Saudi Arabia? You and I both know the true answer. But you’d never have courage to admit it.

            • I almost don’t want to tell you this for fear of illuminating your troll-repertoire, but you might find the answer to your comment-confusion on the bottom right corner of the homepage.

              As usual, when confronted with a discomforting sense of perspective and reason, instead of humbling yourself and actually reading the peer-reviewed academic research I (and probably many others throughout your life) charitably directed you towards, you close your eyes and ears and continue with your desired self-illusions of a bigoted worldview built upon white supremacy. And FYI: the North Carolina Law Review paper which I directed you to IS in fact an example of what you call a peer-reviewed piece of academic research, for future reference. You don’t have to agree with it, but merely reading something like that will dispel many of your myths, if you understand it, like shining any light rids one of darkness.

              That you even bring up Saudi Arabia is the first sign of your delusion, as though this friendly US-backed dictatorship is somehow the benchmark for the ‘black’ to the ‘white’ in your delusional false dichotomy.

              Even if we do ignore it, and presume, ludicrously, that it is far better for the average woman to live in the UK than in Saudi Arabia, what empirical evidence do you have for this? Which metric are you using? Are you using the ideological, cultural norms of your particular upbringing which you are evidently too thick to think outside of, or should I suggest you look at the actual topic of the article you are ranting underneath—violence against women?

              How many “Muslim countries” are in the top 10 countries with the highest rape rates? That’s right, zero.

              How many women are raped in USA or UK every year compared to in so-called “Muslim countries”?

              The shocking empirical evidence will no doubt lead you to construct farfetched interpretations for ignoring the cold, hard facts before you, but that’s the same with every ideology based on necessary self-delusion.

              Again, I’m no fan of Saudi Arabia I’m just highlighting your buffoonish bigotry which blinds you to the crimes of those you feel are superior to those who feel are inferior like yourself. Classic subjugated mentality, white supremacy, mixed with everyday ignorance and bigotry.

              You can just shrug it off and continue in your bubble, no skin off my back. Just don’t expect any replies unless you bring something new, let alone empirically backed facts. You’ve been given more than enough opportunities.

  2. I’m quite shocked that you used statistics “Denmark 52%, Finland 47%, and Sweden 46% of women say they have suffered physical or sexual violence. The UK reports the joint fifth highest incidence of physical and sexual violence (44%)” as evidence that, what, that Nordic countries have more violence against women then any other country? It doesn’t take a genius to know that part of Denmark, Sweden and Finland’s high statistics come from the fact that Nordic laws to protect women have been the most effective and that these percentages are actually indicative of a societies that have supported women to feel comfortable to actually report rape and even understand what is defined as rape, as in many countries both men and women can be taught that, for example, rape doesn’t exist within marriage, or if she’s intoxicated to the point of unconsciousness it is not rape. A change in legislation regarding what is sexual assault vs rape lead to a 25% increase in rape statistics. That wasn’t because 25% more women were suddenly being raped obviously but that a more comprehensive legislative system is working and also successful in giving faith to women that if they report it their rape they will likely succeed in court rather than what old law systems did which was rule heavily against the woman.
    Also what you neglected to look at was that these countries also, from the minute a rape is reported, count that within the statistics, rather than waiting and relying on a court case. So even what could be perceived as a ‘false allegation’, the numbers are recorded within rape statistics. Along with that each rape is counted, so if a woman is raped multiple times by the same man, that is not counted as one rape but multiple. Equally rape statistics are recorded the year they are reported, so old cases, often when the law was not as comprehensive or didn’t seem to be enforced have been surfacing lately.
    In countries where rape and sex remains associated with a strong taboo and a high level of shame (specifically pre-marital sex), the propensity to report such offences is lower than in countries characterized by a higher level of sexual equality. A police force and judicial system enjoining a high level of confidence and a good reputation with the public will produce a higher propensity to report crime than a police force which is discredited, inspires fear or distrust. Hence why a survey of Swedish victims of crimes rated a high majority of feeling no corruption in police, and rape victims specifically noting their trust in the police.
    I feel like you intended to raise good points about rape within Europe still being an issue and that ultimately, with countries with supposedly superior legal system, at the very least attempting to be equal legal systems, still have a long way to go. But you seemed to use this article as a way to dodge blame as if to say ‘not our problem because it’s not us doing the raping’. Equally many who oppose feminism have cited that feminism focuses too much on ‘first world/white feminism’ and not placing importance on issues with developing or underdeveloped countries. Passion and recognition of countries that allow practises like FGM, marital rape etc. shouldn’t be viewed as a bad thing. Yes we must make sure that people don’t blame European rape statistics ON Islam, but often those who claim that Muslims are the problem regarding rape are ignorant and naive to the nature of rape to begin with.

  3. Hajera Belaribi

    This article should not be ‘us and them” issue but rather an evil that exists in every society needs to be tackled and eradicated. Coming from a social work background to a psychotherapist I know these problems of rape and violence against in muslim community is a very grave. Women do not have the support and strength to come out and seek help. The same for women across the board it takes sometime for the women to gain courage to seek help.

    I know a case of a revert sister opening a women refuge in dubai where she received death threat from men for violating their community. Muslim world has no such mechanism or systems to find out how the fairer gender are fairing in their societies.

  4. Interesting statistic:

    A 2006 study by The American Association of University Women indicates the following:

    62% of female college students report having been sexually harassed at their university, with 80% of the reported harassment being peer-to-peer.
    51% of male college students admit to sexually harassing someone in college, with 22% admitting to harassing someone often or occasionally.
    It is important to acknowledge that statistics do not give a complete picture of the pervasiveness of the problem as most sexual harassment situations go unreported.

    Taken from

    Nearly two thirds of women have had a male work colleague behave “inappropriately” towards them, new research reveals.

    And of the 60% who said they had experienced this behaviour in the workplace, 21% classed it as persistent.

    When it came to inappropriate comments and touching, more than half the offenders were more senior members of staff, and two thirds of women said the inappropriate behaviour came from a married man. But despite saying the behaviour of their colleagues was often degrading and embarrassing, only 27% reported the behaviour to someone senior. The research, which was commissioned by employment law specialists Slater & Gordon and polled 1,579 people, also found almost 40% of men surveyed said they had been victims of sexual harassment.
    Claire Dawson, an employment lawyer with the firm, said: “We deal with some really shocking cases of sexual harassment in the workplace, but it’s always surprising to hear how widespread the issue is and how many women don’t feel like they can report behaviour like this.”

    More than a third of women surveyed said a senior male colleague had made inappropriate comments about their breasts, sex life, backside, or the clothes they were wearing.
    One in six women had been forced to fend off a colleague who tried to kiss them and 12% had a colleague place his hand on her behind.
    Of the 24% of women who had a superior make a move on them, 5% then lost their job, and more than one in 10 said they had been turned down for a promotion.
    The most common places for women to experience inappropriate behaviour were at their desk while they were working late, at an office party or in a staff corridor or lift.
    The law firm says the legal definition of sexual harassment is if a person’s dignity has been violated or a perpetrator has created an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.

    The survey found that one quarter said they did not think people commenting on their body parts was sexual harassment, one third did not think someone viewing pornography near them was sexual harassment and more than half did not think inappropriate comments about their partner from a colleague or discussions about their sex life was harassment.
    Speaking on Sky News, entrepreneur Katie Hopkins cast doubt on some of the harassment claims. She said: “We have to question these people who make these complaints.
    “If you can see down the blouse, don’t wear the blouse.”
    Shadow women and equalities minister Gloria De Piero said: “This research shows just how far we still have to travel on women’s equality.
    “We should be doing more to empower women to challenge this behaviour and come forward and report it to their employer.”

    -Loss of jobs
    -Litigations and court cases
    -Loss of productivity/distraction
    -Psychological: anxiety, depression and suicidal ideas
    -Great economic loss
    -Plus a lot of sins
    London School of Islamics Trust

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *