While the UK is in the grip of election fever, Britain’s Muslims are facing up to the dizzying quandary of which electoral outcome, if any, can truly benefit the legions of Muslims in the UK.
Muslims in Britain constitute 4.8% of the population, making us the second largest faith group in the UK after Christians. We tend to come from lower-income households and experience higher levels of unemployment. 48% of Muslims are aged 24 and under and half of British Muslims live in the 10% most deprived areas of the UK. These factors usually edge voters to the left. Thus Britain’s Muslims have traditionally voted overwhelmingly in favour of Labour, with the party boasting 84% of Bangladeshi and 80% of the Pakistani vote in 1997.
Tony Blair’s disastrous warmongering escapades into Iraq and Afghanistan have since diffused British Muslim loyalties across the political spectrum. It turns out that murdering a million Iraqi citizens in order to maximise Persian Gulf oil flows and facilitate the Anglo-American manipulation of global energy levels is a bit of a turn-off to British Muslims. Who would have thought?
According to official Government guidelines we must subscribe to “fundamental British values like democracy” or run the risk of being condemned as extremists. This, despite the fact that democracy is only about as British as taramosalata: the birthplace of democracy being Athens, not Whitehall.
So quick, where should we put our crosses on the ballot paper?
Both the Tories and Labour have converged at the centre of British politics in recent years, abandoning the British Muslim voting base. The Liberal Democrats were the chief benefactors of this in the last general election, garnering a significant proportion of the Muslim vote. But just like the time I thought it would be a good idea to trim my finger nail with a pencil sharpener, voting Libdem proved to be a very painful mistake. Having Maajid Nawaz on your books never helps either. He remains about as palatable to the British Muslim community as a soggy ham sandwich.
Anyway, due to the high concentration of British Muslims in certain areas, there are around 32 marginal constituencies where the Muslim vote will hold great sway. But can any political party hope to galvanise the British Muslim vote in 2015?
British Muslims are a largely undecided demographic. This makes interesting comparison to a recent poll suggesting that British Jews will be voting overwhelmingly in favour of the Conservatives, citing attitudes toward Israel as “very important” in influencing their vote. With 53% of British Muslims born outside of the UK, foreign policy is the leading concern among British Muslims too. Palestinian statehood representing the most attractive foreign policy for British Muslim voters, with the Muslim Engagement and Development group (MEND) including it in its impressive Muslim Manifesto.
Above and beyond British foreign policy, the Muslim Vote is not a particularly difficult one to appeal to. Granted Muslims in Britain are not a single homogenous group but there are general domestic policy areas that are likely to draw our collective political interest. Muslims tend to have an appreciation for family values, wealth redistribution and social justice (as well as an itching curiosity to see how well a blindfolded Nigel Farage would fare in North Peckham Estate on a Friday night).
Ed Miliband’s condemnation of the Iraq War in his efforts to shed the party of the toxic reputation consigned by New Labour was a welcoming development. Labour’s Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic manifesto, to be unveiled by Sadiq Khan, details some interesting policies; like the plan to finally include Islamophobia as a legitimate and punishable hate crime. If Labour can reinvent itself as the party of the working class once again, standing up strongly for the welfare state, it may begin to think about winning back the Muslim vote.
For now though, the legacy of Blair’s bellicose foreign policy still looms largely over British politics. The blowback effects of the War on Terror and the ensuing chaos caused by ISIS are direct results of New Labour’s disastrous foreign policies. Ed Miliband must condemn the actions of his predecessors and neutralise the current government’s assault on civil liberties if he is serious about winning the Muslim vote.
Katie Hopkins’ promise to leave the country if Ed Milliband becomes PM likely caused a surge in Google searches for “countries furthest from UK” and “least populated countries”. I believe Alofi, Niue is not too bad at this time of the year, Katie.
The Tory Government have not done too badly during their time at Number 10, except for a few misgivings. Like Teresa May wanting to nick your passport just because your Nan visited Damascus once upon a time; and Michael Gove debating with himself whether your local Imām’s toddler biting his pacifier constitutes “violent” or “non-violent” “extremism”; and the Prime Minister alienating the entire Muslim community by constantly juxtaposing us with his vague integration narratives based on “British values”; and the brutal gnawing away at the welfare state, like Eric Pickles working through a box of doughnuts; and Conservative councillor Chris Joannides comparing Muslim women who wear the face veil to bin bags. Apart from all that though, the Tories seem to be working hard to better the 16% of ethnic minority votes they got in 2010 which,compared to 68% for Labour, is pretty pathetic.
The small chance the Tories stood to win the Muslim Vote was lost when Baroness Warsi resigned having described the government’s policy on Gaza as “morally indefensible”. The Conservatives have now impatiently turned their attention to the Hindu community, finding it “easier to penetrate electorally”.
Yes, the British Muslim community need to find a better way of expressing their grievances than either burning poppies or wearing nice little poppy-printed hijabs, but who should we vote for? If, indeed, at all?
In a political climate where religious conservatism is being viewed as a conveyor belt toward violent extremism, it is becoming increasingly difficult for Muslims to practise their religion seriously and express meaningful legitimate political dissent without becoming the subject of considerable suspicion. Our government seems to liken any criticism of its foreign policy or its security services to outright treason. A host of draconian anti-terror measures have disproportionately targeted Britain’s Muslims, leaving us struggling to find a way to vent our social marginalisation. In its Autumn 2013 poll, the Eurobarometer found that just 24% of people “tended to trust” the UK government.
Thanks largely to Russel Brand, the decision to abstain from voting altogether is no longer seen as a symptom of ignorance and laziness. It may be seen instead as a stern expression of dissatisfaction with the modern political paradigm. It is no longer inconceivable that people may conscientiously decide not to take part in the democratic process. The UK’s proportion of young people voting in an election at 38% was way lower than the EU average of 56%. Indeed, there has been a significant drop in the number of people who believe voting is the only way to have their say.
Will our voice be heard loudest through its absence? Either way, we are always willing to listen.
It’s not a particularly well written article. Reading between the lines I get the impression that it’s written by a journalist from the mainstream media. Could the author explain the omission of the Green Party and the mugshot of Natalie Bennett whilst mentioning Lib-Lab-Con, and showing a mugshot of Nigel Farage holding a pint glass? The Greens are putting in an almost complete slate of candidates for England. Also, why are no other small parties mentioned? An increasing number of Muslims are now looking outside of the Lib-Lab-Con establishment but Muslim writers about politics are slow to catch on and give these parties serious coverage.
“Thus Britain’s Muslims have traditionally voted overwhelmingly in favour of Labour, with the party boasting 84% of Bangladeshi and 80% of the Pakistani vote in 1997”
It’s 18 years old and irrelevant. One could argue that the voters of Enfield Southgate voted overwhelmingly in favour of Labour in 1997. The world has changed since then in numerous ways and the results of that election are no longer meaningful for anybody.
“The Tory Government have not done too badly during their time at Number 10, except for a few misgivings.”
What about the extradition of Babar Ahmad and Talha Ahsan? What about the rewritten Prevent Strategy which is nothing short of a political programme effectively prohibiting any alternative discourse to liberal social values and British foreign policy? What about the CTS Act rushed in at the last minute without any serious consultation and debate? Theresa May is without doubt openly and unashamedly hostile towards Islam to a degree greater than many in the BNP would go – and I was once a member of this party so I know what took place inside it.
“Ed Miliband’s condemnation of the Iraq War in his efforts to shed the party of the toxic reputation consigned by New Labour was a welcoming development”
Bear in mind that Ed Milliband is a Zionist of Jewish bloodlines who will never betray Israel or the international Jewish community. He was only picked as leader by the trade unions and is an unpopular leader with the public who is likely to cost Labour an outright victory, and if he becomes PM, then it’s unlikely that he could last for more than one term without civil war breaking out in the party. Already Labour faces serious opposition from the SNP and UKIP in their own traditional heartlands.
One could choose the path of forgive and forget about the Iraq war under Labour but it’s disingenous and naive to blame it all on Blair. Take into account how many backbench MPs, councillors, and rank and file party members supported his decision to go to war. It’s not as if cutting out Blair and his cronies cuts out the rot because the rot permeates throughout the Labour party right down to grassroots levels. Old Labour New Labour is a red herring. The support or opposition for the Iraq war were independent of member’s economic views. There were plenty of ‘flat cap and a pint of mild’ Old Labour members from northern towns who opposed Blair’s economic policies and NuLab but still backed his decision to go to war. The same applies to non-Muslim black and Asian members from heavily ethnic areas who bang on about race relations and the interests of the ethnic community but still overwhelmingly accepted and respected the decision of Blair and Parliament to go to war.
Vote Green people!!!
The Cons and Lab are two sides of the same old coin, UKIP’s bigoted and the Libs are addicted to breaking promises.
Vote Green if you live in England, SNP in Scotland and Plaid Cymru in Wales.
Peace be upon you,
Besides the shirk aspect of voting…
The other point most people don’t mention is – who in the world should you vote for?!
Even entertainers like Russell Brand and George Michael realise the foolishness of voting because all political parties (except perhaps the Green party or Respect), they are all the same, same lies and promises, and when they’re in power, they do anything that they desire (or rather, anything that they are paid to do (by multi-national corporations)). Thus Russell Brand actually tells his followers not to vote!
George Galloway said it best when he said the 3 parties were basically “twiddle dee, twiddle doo, and twiddle dum” – they are all the same.
And Galloway said it best when he compared Labour and Conservatives as “two cheeks of the same bum!”
As Russell Brand said, it’s pointless to vote until we have a revolution!
AA. I think your opening sentence displays my issue with the article. It portrays split sections: a UK population grappling with general election issue choices (“While the UK is”), and then Muslims as something separate and, worse still, seemingly in it for themselves (“can truly benefit the legions of Muslims in the UK”) – whether this portrayal is intended or not I’m not sure. We cannot go on thinking in terms of Muslims “in” Britain, it must shift to thinking about Muslims “OF” Britain – the difference here is key. General elections choices must be about general issues impacting the country and its citizens. Faith is one aspect of many.
An Election Guide should help individual citizens consider and weigh up competing party offerings on issues such as the economy, health care, education, law and order, social welfare, housing, pensions, taxation, transport and so on. Muslims will be voting as citizens but processing bundles of issues will no doubt be vary greatly for individuals. They will be different across different social classes; between those who employ staff, those employed and those unemployed; between age groups; and whether one is a first generation or a fourth generation great-grandchild of a migrant… it goes on.
But there is no analysis presented in this guide really, and even less understanding of the basic workings of government it would appear. For example, the first job of any government is to protect the security of a nation and its citizens. There may be many kinds organized criminal activity, but none directly threaten and target the state with violence… except in the case of a “Muslim” threat. It’s not just a threat either, it’s real violence against the state: 7/7, Glasgow airport, Lee Rigby, Hemming. Hence the need for the state power to protect (including the need to protect its Muslims).
These political actions are not really based on party, as you have alluded, but on the responsibility of government. The party did it did because it had the responsibility of government. In the broader international space, the national interests override party cultures. Whereas the general election is really about the general issues of civil society and civic administration.
I realise what I have written is harsh but I think it is a shame that on such an important matter you have presented much less of a “guide to elections” and much more of a dismissive rant.
Still undecided but this piece made me reflect as well as laugh