Updates
Home / Islamic Thought / Propagation / Education / When France almost went Islamic: ʿAbd-ar Raḥmān al-Ghafiqi

When France almost went Islamic: ʿAbd-ar Raḥmān al-Ghafiqi

 

“Of the believers are men who are true to that which they covenanted with Allāh. Some of them have paid their vow by death (in battle)…”[1]

The recent tragic events in Paris have put the spotlight on the Muslims in France. Indeed, there was a time when the land of the Muslims stretched from the Middle East, through Africa, the Iberian Peninsula right up to, and including, parts of France. This was during the Ummayad Caliphate when Muslims were perhaps the foremost military power in the world.

Tariq b. Ziyad led a conquest and liberated Spain, in or around 710 from the tyrannical Visigoths. Following that, the Umayyad troops under Al-Samh b. Malik al-Khawlani, the walī (governor general) of al-Andalus, overran Septimania. This included the area known today as Catalunia, and he set a base in Narbonne in Southern France which lies 849 km (528 miles) from Paris. To Muslims, this location was known as Arbuna.

In 721AD, Al-Samh b. Malik led a contingent of Muslims to Toulouse in France. Here they laid siege to subdue an enemy fighting under Duke Odo (also known as Eudes the Great), whose territory included the Duchy of Vasconia (in the south-west of Gaul) and the Duchy of Aquitaine. During the siege, Odo deceived the Muslims by appearing to leave the city, only to return by launching a surprise ambush and attack on them and, in the process, mortally wounding Samh b. Malik.

Duke Odo was sandwiched between the Muslims in the south in Spain and the emerging Franks in the north. In 730, Emīr ʿAbd-ar Raḥmān al-Ghafiqi turned his attention to the north and launched an attack on Odo’s state of Aquatine. It was reported that the advance of the Muslims was so devastating that they went through places like a desolating storm. They advanced as far as Bordeaux where they encountered and defeated the army of Odo, forcing Odo to retreat further north. Western chroniclers record that ‘God alone knows the number of the slain’ in this battle whilst the losses to the Muslims were minimal.[2]

Odo sought assistance from his foes, the Franks, who were led by Charles Martel. Martel agreed to assist Odo but only on condition that Odo agreed to submit to Frankish authority, to which Odo agreed.

In 732, the Muslims continued to advance north and would eventually come up against the Franks. Despite the importance of the upcoming battle, its exact location is unknown, although most historians assume it took place between Tours and Poiters and hence it is often referred to as the ‘Battle of Tours’ or the ‘Battle of Poiters’.

The Battle

Even before Odo asked for support, Martel had been planning for an engagement with the Muslims since the battle of Toulouse a decade before, and had with him a well-prepared army who had campaigned with him all over Europe. They were financed by the Church who regarded him and his army as a necessity for the safeguarding of Christianity against the Muslims.

The battlefield was chosen by Martel who was determined to prevent the expansion of the Caliphate over the Pyrenees into the heart of Christian Europe. Martel carefully chose the location positioning his men on a high, wooded plain. The Frankish army was mostly infantry whereas the Umayyad army was mostly cavalry. The positioning of the Franks made it difficult for the Umayyads to judge the size of the opposition since Martel used the trees and forest to make his force appear larger than it was. For six days, the armies stood still observing each other; the Franks at the top of the hill with the forest as their backdrop whilst the Umayyads were at the bottom of the hill with the open field as their backdrop. Whilst Martel and the Franks were well prepared for the cold winter, ʿAbd-ar Raḥmān and his men were not prepared for the intense cold of an oncoming northern European winter. Not wanting to delay the stalemate indefinitely, on the seventh day, ʿAbd-ar Raḥmān made his move and led the charge up the hill with his the cavalry, with his men clasping lances, swords and bows.

On the second day, Muslim horsemen dashed fiercely and frequently forward against the battalions of the Franks who resisted manfully. Just as the Muslim army made a breakthrough into the interior of the Frankish square and victory was in sight, the Franks deployed a clever tactic which was reminiscent of the famous battle of Uḥud. Martel sent a detachment force to approach from the rear of the Muslim army with the task of taking the ghanīmah (booty) that the Muslims had gathered on their expedition through France and cutting down their supply train. As news of this filtered through to the front line, many from the Muslim army began to retreat and flee to protect their booty. ʿAbd-ar Raḥmān continued to fight courageously and attempted to restore order by rallying his troops as he could sense that victory was in sight. However, ʿAbd-ar Raḥmān became surrounded with one too many of the Franks and he was martyred on the battlefield, thus remaining true to his covenant with his Lord.[3]

The Qur’anic viewpoint is worth noting here, for it is as relevant to this event as it was at the time of Uḥud:

“And Allāh did indeed fulfil His promise to you when you were killing them (your enemy) with His permission; until you flinched and fell to disputing about the order, and disobeyed after He showed you what you love. Among you are some that desire this world and some that desire the Hereafter. Then He made you flee from them, that He might test you. But surely, He forgave you, and Allāh is Most Gracious to the believers. [And remember] when you ran away without even casting a side glance at anyone, and the Messenger was in your rear calling you back. There did Allāh give you one distress after another by way of requital, to teach you not to grieve for that which had escaped you, nor for what struck you. And Allāh is Well Aware of all that you do.[4]

Despite the defeat, the Umayyads remained in control of Narbonne and Septimania for another 27 years, though they could not expand further. The treaties reached earlier with the local population stood firm and were further consolidated in 734 by the governor of Narbonne, Yūsuf b. ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Fihri. He concluded agreements with several towns on common defence arrangements against the encroachments of Charles Martel, who had systematically brought the south to its heels as he extended his domains. However, it was left to Martel’s son, Pippin the Short, to force Narbonne’s surrender in 759, bringing Narbonne into the Frankish domain. With this concluded the areas of France being part of the Muslims lands after a period of 30-40 years.

 

Points to Note:

The battle marked the northernmost point of the spread of the Islamic Dawah, wherein afterward, no raid or campaign would quite venture that far north. Many may seek to argue that the Muslims were the aggressors in this conflict. However, it must be understood that there was a precursor to the Muslims going in. Duke Odo had concluded an alliance with the deputy governor of Catalunya, ʿUthmān b. Naissa, in order to set up an independent Catalunya and destabilise the state. The Muslims, therefore, had every right to respond to Odo’s mischief-making.

The principal point to note with respect to the battle itself was that the indiscipline of the Muslim army was a significant factor in the loss of the battle. Many western historians such as Edward Gibbon have noted that this was one of the most decisive victories for the survival of the dominance of Christendom in the Western hemisphere. Had France fallen, there would have been no stopping the Muslims, and no other state would have been as organised as Martel’s Franks in order to offer any real resistance. For Leopold von Ranke, “Poitiers was the turning point of one of the most important epochs in the history of the world”. Conversely, Muslim historians such as Ibn Idhari narrated the event in a positive light despite the defeat by stating “Abd ar-Rahman and many of his men found martyrdom on the balat ash-Shuhada’i (“the path of the martyrs”).”[5]

Many have also commentated that the Muslims could very easily have subdued the whole of France had they taken their time, consolidated their victories and fortified the towns that they conquered and liberated before moving further up north.

This event also marked a turning point in the battle between the two competing faiths, Islām and Christianity. It marked one of the first defeats for the Muslims in Europe which would, in time, result in the complete loss of Al-Andalus, Spain. It would be another 700 years before Muslims made inroads into Europe again via the Balkans under the Ottomans.

May Allāh’s mercy be on the martyrs, particularly the courageous ʿAbd-ar Raḥmān al-Ghafiqi.

 

Source: www.islam21c.com

Notes:

[1] Al-Qur’ān, 33:23

[2] Battle of Tours, John C. Scott; Medieval Sourcebook: Arabs, Franks, and the Battle of Tours, 732: Three Accounts, Fordham University

[3] As set out in the verse at the outset of this article

[4] Al-Qur’ān, 3:152

[4] al-Bayan al-Mughrib fi Akhbar al-Maghrib, Ibn Idhari,

About Z A Rahman

Z.A Rahman is a community activist and a member of a large Mosque in the UK. He graduated in Law, specialising in discrimination law and now works for a leading national company. He has a keen interest in politics and history, particularly Islamic history. He also enjoys traveling and has visited numerous countries in the Middle East and North Africa.

5 comments

  1. Well actually, most of the Middle East almost became Mongol. Hulugu’s Army was well on it’s way to conquer Egypt and essentially the entire region. The main reason this never happened ,was because the Great Khan passed away and Hulugu and most of his Army went home to contest succession.The Muslims faced a much smaller army and were actually helped as well by Christians who hated the Mongols as well. The lesser of two evils depending on your viewpoint.

    • @ Tom, the Crusading Christians in this period were indeed considered the lesser of two evils in the same way that Muslims were equally viewed as such by the Crusading Christians as against that Mongols. Of course, once the Mongols were defeated, it marked the end of the Crusaders until the Europeans powers arrived once more after the First World War.

      • you show your usual accuracy, Mr Rahman, when you say ” once the Mongols were defeated, it marked the end of the Crusaders until the Europeans powers arrived once more after the First World War.” The Spanish Reconquista and the Portuguese naval destruction of the Indian-Arab trade in the sixteenth century were both crusades. If the Ottoman invasions of Europe you enthuse over elsewhere were jihads the counterattacks and rebellions were crusades – indeed, the recent attacks on Yugoslav “muslims” by Serbs were justified in terms of religious war and religious revenge.

        It’s worth remembering that the Ottoman involvement in the First World War was a matter of realpolitik. Even the sultan’s proclamation of jihad was intended to have a politico-military effect. The talk of crusades by the Ottomans’ enemies was completely rhetorical. The Ottomans gambled in the hope of expanding their empire and bringing former provinces to heel. They lost and they paid the price. Were it not for Ataturk’s military genius they would have paid an even greater price.

  2. Islam Did Indeed Conquer France But, As With Most Things, Muslims Failed And Continue To Fail To Realise That Just As You Can’t Teach Or Instil Vocation Islam “The Religion Of Peace/Salaam/Shalom” Cannot Be Imposed By Force Of Arms – Muslims Can And Should Defend Themselves But Not Under The Guise Of Promoting Islam Set Out – As Did Gengis Khan And Richard The Lion Heart, For Booty Not Religious Duty. However The Mongols Eventually Were Defeated By Encountering Islam And Becoming Civilised As A Result. Similarly The Definitive Declaration On Islam By Napoleon Bonaparte The Most Famous Corsican And Greatest Frenchman Of All Time Confirms This To Have Been The Same Reason In His Case. Tragically The Muslims Failed To Recognise The Great Opportunity That His And The Conversion Of General Abdullah Jaques Menou Provided – If Napoleon Had Been In Office Charlie Ebdo Would Not Have Been Permitted To Have Been Published Nor Voltaire’s Mohamet, Which Napoleon Described To Goethe In 1808 As: “Not A Suitable Portrayal Of The Conqueror Of The World”: –

    NAPOLEON Etl’ISLAM
    Par Cherfills chrétiennes
    Originaire PUBLIÉ EN 1914

    “Je Souhaite Que Le Temps Est Pas Loin Où Je Serai Capable D’unir Tous Les Hommes Sages Et Instruits Dans Le Pays Et D’établir Un Régime Uniforme, Fondé Sur Les Principes Du Coran Qui Seules Sont Vraies Et Qui Seul Peut Conduire Les Hommes Au Bonheur … Le Christianisme Ne Prêche Que Servitude Et Dépendance … “(Voir La Quatrième Partie -. Correspondances De Napoléon Ier, No.3,148 La Page 110.)
    NAPOLEON Etl’ISLAM
    By Christian Cherfills
    ORIGINALY PUBLISHED IN 1914 – TRANSLATED FOR THE THE ISLAMIC PARTY OF BRITAIN BY JAMES GIBB-STUART.

    “I hope that the time is not far off when I shall be able to unite all the wise and educated men in the country and establish a uniform regime based on the principles of the Qur’an which alone are true and which alone can lead men to happiness… Christianity preaches only servitude and dependence…” (See Part Four – Correspondences of Napoleon Ist, No.3,148. page 110.)
    IN 1798 HIS MUSLIM NAME WAS ALI BONAPARTE ALSO NOTE THAT 94% OF HIS CIVIL CODE IS BASED ON THE FIQH/JURISPRUDENCE OF IMAM MALIK.
    The Islamic Party Of Britain Far From Being, According To Wikipedia, A “Defunct” Organisation – Has Continued Since Its Inception To Identify And Bring To Light Such Information – What French Muslims Should Do, Is Organise To Commemorate This Truly Remarkable Character By Gathering To Pray A Somewhat Belated Ṣalāt Al-Janāzah In Paris Where He Was Buried Without Having Had Such A Ceremony And Without 99.99999% Of Muslims Being Aware Of That Fact. Had They Been So Then The Terms Anglo-Saxon & Afro-Saxon Would Have Been Interchangeable – Which Would Have Been The Case Had The Sultan Of Morocco Accepted The Baya Of King John [Richard’s Brother] Who Sent His Ambassador Back With The Understanding That They Could Not See What Value A Tiny Island Could Add To Their Prestige Ignoring Completely The Fact That Richard Was At The Gates Of Jerusalem And John Could Have Cut Off His Supply Of Taxes …The End As They Say Is History – But Unfortunately The Accounts Written By The Victors. As Churchill: “History Will Be Kind To Me – For I Shall Write It”.

  3. Islam Did Indeed Conquer France But, As With Most Things, Muslims Failed And Continue To Fail To Realise That Just As You Can’t Teach Or Instil Vocation – Islam “The Religion Of Peace/Salaam/Shalom” Cannot Be Imposed By Force Of Arms – Muslims Can And Should Defend Themselves But Not Under The Guise Of Promoting Islam Set Out – As Did Gengis Khan And Richard The Lion Heart, For Booty Not Religious Duty. However The Mongols Eventually Were Defeated By Encountering Islam And Becoming Civilised As A Result. Similarly The Definitive Declaration On Islam By Napoleon Bonaparte The Most Famous Corsican And Greatest Frenchman Of All Time Confirms This To Have Been The Same Reason In His Case. Tragically The Muslims Failed To Recognise The Great Opportunity That His And The Conversion Of General Abdullah Jaques Menou Provided. For example If Napoleon Had Been In Office Charlie Ebdo Would Not Have Been Permitted To Have Been Published Nor Voltaire’s Mohamet, Which Napoleon Described To Goethe In 1808 As: “Not A Suitable Portrayal Of The Conqueror Of The World”: –

    NAPOLEON Etl’ISLAM
    Par Cherfills chrétiennes
    Originaire PUBLIÉ EN 1914

    “Je Souhaite Que Le Temps Est Pas Loin Où Je Serai Capable D’unir Tous Les Hommes Sages Et Instruits Dans Le Pays Et D’établir Un Régime Uniforme, Fondé Sur Les Principes Du Coran Qui Seules Sont Vraies Et Qui Seul Peut Conduire Les Hommes Au Bonheur … Le Christianisme Ne Prêche Que Servitude Et Dépendance … “(Voir La Quatrième Partie -. Correspondances De Napoléon Ier, No.3,148 La Page 110.)
    NAPOLEON Etl’ISLAM
    By Christian Cherfills
    ORIGINALY PUBLISHED IN 1914 – TRANSLATED FOR THE THE ISLAMIC PARTY OF BRITAIN BY JAMES GIBB-STUART.

    “I hope that the time is not far off when I shall be able to unite all the wise and educated men in the country and establish a uniform regime based on the principles of the Qur’an which alone are true and which alone can lead men to happiness… Christianity preaches only servitude and dependence…” (See Part Four – Correspondences of Napoleon Ist, No.3,148. page 110.)

    IN 1798 HIS MUSLIM NAME WAS ALI BONAPARTE ALSO NOTE THAT 94% OF HIS CIVIL CODE IS BASED ON THE FIQH/JURISPRUDENCE OF IMAM MALIK. ALL EU LAW IS BASED ON IT – BAD NEWS FOR LE PEN AND WILDERS

    The Islamic Party Of Britain Far From Being, According To Wikipedia, A “Defunct” Organisation – Has Continued Since Its Inception To Identify And Bring To Light Such Information – What French Muslims Should Do, Is Organise To Commemorate This Truly Remarkable Character By Gathering To Pray A Somewhat Belated Ṣalāt Al-Janāzah In Paris Where Napoleon Was Buried Without Having Had Such A Ceremony And Without 99.99999% Of Muslims Being Aware Of That Fact. Had They Been So Then The Terms Anglo-Saxon & Afro-Saxon Would Have Been Interchangeable – Which Would Have Been The Case Had The Sultan Of Morocco Accepted The Baya Of King John [Richard’s Brother] Who Sent John’s Ambassador Back With The Understanding That They Could Not See What Value A Tiny Island Could Add To Their Prestige – Ignoring Completely The Fact That Richard Was At The Gates Of Jerusalem And John Could Have Cut Off His Supply Of English Taxes to the delight of his subjects …The End As They Say Is History – But Unfortunately The Accounts Written By The Victors. As Churchill remarked: “History Will Be Kind To Me – For I Shall Write”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Verify *

DON'T MISS OUT!
Subscribe To Newsletter
Be the first to get latest updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
Stay Updated
Give it a try, you can unsubscribe anytime.
close-link
Subscribe for Updates or Support Us