Updates
Home / Current Affairs / Racism in the UK Runs Much Deeper than Brexit
Kevin J. Frost / Shutterstock.com

Racism in the UK Runs Much Deeper than Brexit

Brexit is exhausting. It has become such a dominant and polarising issue. Three years ago, the UK’s decision to vote for Brexit might have been the answer to a simple question: in or out? But since then, the matter of how to leave the EU has turned out to be a great deal more complicated and has led to nowhere useful. The sad reality is that the political vacuum arising from the Brexit referendum appears to have lowered the quality of political discourse, creating room for new populist political movements that are even more powerful than mainstream parties. The most obvious example of this is the recent rise of the right-wing populism of Nigel Farage, with its starting point reflected in UKIP’s wins in the 2014 European Parliament elections, leading to the Tory offer of a referendum that eventually led to Brexit. Dubbed as an effective demagogue of a generation, Farage set the racist agenda concerning Brexit.

The first point to acknowledge is the centrality of racism to—now mainstream—Brexit arguments. There is no need to downplay racism’s hold in Brexit Britain any longer. Farage’s infamous and xenophobic ‘breaking point’ anti-immigration poster symbolically reflected his modus operandi. Far from impeding him, his sanitised and more ‘polite’ brand of racism became his ticket to success. The Brexit referendum thus emboldened racists and led to increase in violence against immigrants and BAME communities. Controlling immigration became a euphemism for xenophobia and racism. The increased incidence of post-Brexit hate crimes in the UK showcased two conclusions. The first was that there exists a link between Euroscepticism and racial or bigoted animus. The second conclusion was that hate crimes against all marginalised groups spiked; some of these groups were not even directly related to Brexit. The Brexit vote should have been a peaceful way to exercise concern for the United Kingdom’s relationship with the EU. As it turned out, for some it became a mandate for hateful behaviour. [1]

Thus, in the present context, racists are feeling increasingly confident in deploying overt abuse or discrimination. This is reflected in a survey by Opinium, quoted by The Guardian. Today, 7 in 10 ethnic minority individuals report having faced racial discrimination, compared to 58% before the Brexit vote in June 2016. Omar Khan, the chief executive of the race quality think tank Runnymede Trust, said it was now clear that Brexit, while not the source of racism, had led to higher levels being expressed, and that social media was “normalising hate and increasing division.” [2] According to another report, the aftermath of Brexit saw British Muslims suffer an “explosion” in faith-based hatred, with many women afraid to go on about their daily lives. The report found that while far-right activists are often involved in online incidents, many of their attacks happen in the real world. Such reports continued to demonstrate that anti-Muslim hatred and Islamophobia is still a significant social and political issue in the UK. [3]

The racism or xenophobia that animated some people in the 2016 referendum remains an indisputable fact of national life in the UK. However, racism did not begin—nor will it end—with Brexit. Racism goes deeper than that, just as racism in the US has always run deeper than the electoral cycle or Trump’s divisive presidential campaign. It has its moorings not only in the aching loss of the British Empire, but also the structural decline that Britain has undergone since the late 1970s and the onset of neoliberalism. The politics of Englishness today asserts itself against a backdrop of Britain’s comparatively marginal position in the world economy. Alongside this were the defeats endured by the social movements of the 1980s and the accompanying delegitimisation of socialist politics, which has left a working class profoundly disaggregated by region, nation, and ethnicity. In this sense, it is the transformations of the 1980s, rather than the austerity programmes since 2008, that bear heaviest on our present moment. [4] It is a dichotomy that racism appears to be so deeply embedded in Western thinking, when modern liberal-democratic philosophy is supposed to be based on the Kantian idea of equal moral worth. Racism is therefore a denial of that worth to people of non-white ‘races’ or, in the words of Kant, being treated ‘merely as a means’.

The reality is that the long and brutal history of British colonialism and empire lies at the heart of much of British insularity and racism. The deep roots of this racism will likely influence the politics of tomorrow, as it has already done that of yesterday and today. In the contemporary context, Goldberg (2008) suggests:

“Traditional racism has not disappeared but rather racisms have proliferated, in kind and quantity. New racisms refer to emergent forms of discrimination that have replaced older, biologically-based racism. Contemporary examples of such new racisms include Islamophobia and anti-‘migrant’ hostility, which draw upon older anxieties about identity, ‘race’, place and citizenship … In the context of ‘Brexit’, we must recognise that concerns around identity, place and citizenship are highly-racialised, through structures that enable white normativity to go unchallenged and which obfuscate the centrality of racism in contemporary Britain. [5]

Thus, the racist populist movement we are currently experiencing in Britain is not a temporary aberration. Another concern has been that the increase in racism on social media raises concerns about whether online channels are normalising hate and increasing division.

In an interview with the Financial Times in July 2019, Tendayi Achiume, the UN’s special rapporteur for racial equality, said that the UK Government’s ‘hostile environment’ policy, designed to tackle undocumented immigration, had encouraged racism. Achiume added that Brexit had amplified racial disparities and xenophobia. Achiume also criticised Prevent, concluding that race and ethnicity shape outcomes in every area of life in the UK. Achiume described the “structural socio-economic exclusion” of ethnic minorities as “striking” and largely owing to government policy. [6]

It often seems as though racism and populism has been defining our current political age. The growth of right-wing, nationalist, anti-immigration, anti-asylum seeker, anti-Muslim politics is not confined to the UK or Europe; it has gone global. Despite international conventions and declarations, racism has been dehumanising individuals and communities not only by denying their inherent equality and dignity, but by doing so on the basis of a constructed category of race designed for the very purpose of separating humans into a hierarchy meant to elevate some and suppress many. Yet the international legal community’s response to racism has been inadequate, at best. Even when nations agree to play a part in dismantling racism, many simply point the finger elsewhere rather than at themselves.

Martin Luther King Jr. once said: “It may be true that morality cannot be legislated, but behaviour can be regulated. The law may not change the heart, but it can restrain the heartless.” This is an apt reminder of the challenges faced by societies in combating the scourges of racism and racial discrimination. To counter such a bleak future, mass mobilisation is necessary. Any form of progressive mass mobilisation has to recognise that class politics are always articulated through a politics of race. Reckoning with Britain’s racism and xenophobia across time, place, parties, and social classes is the necessary first step in such a mobilisation.[7] It is also necessary to consider that not only do anti-racists need to oppose a political climate that feeds racism and xenophobia, they also need to get to grips with how populism has shaped the terms of anti-racist struggle. It behoves public activists to force the hands of Britain’s leaders to ensure that ethnic minorities feel safe and secure. Otherwise, populist politics based on nationalism and linked to racist and anti-immigrant sentiment will continue to challenge the concept of a multi-cultural, post-Brexit Britain.

Register by midnight on 26 November to vote in the General Election on 12 December.

Click here to register to vote

Click here to view the candidates competing to be your MP

Source: www.islam21c.com

Notes:

[1] https://www.humanityinaction.org/knowledge_detail/understanding-the-brexit-vote-the-impact-of-polish-immigrants-on-euroscepticism/

[2] https://www.scmp.com/news/world/europe/article/3011070/racism-rise-uk-brexit-vote-study-reveals

[3] https://tellmamauk.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Tell%20MAMA%20Annual%20Report%202018%20_%20Normalising%20Hate.pdf

[4] https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2018/10/09/race-class-and-brexit-how-did-we-get-here/

[5] http://usir.salford.ac.uk/id/eprint/50206/14/Post-race%20Brexit%20FINAL[1].pdf

[6] https://www.ft.com/content/a5ed1582-9f13-11e9-9c06-a4640c9feebb

[7] https://www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/after-brexit-reckoning-with-britains-racism-and-xenophobia/

About Lukman Harees

3 comments

  1. I really like the Martin Luther King Jr. quote in the article. He said: “It may be true that morality cannot be legislated, but behaviour can be regulated. The law may not change the heart, but it can restrain the heartless.” It reminds me of the saying attributed to both Uthman (ra) and Umar Ibn al-Khattab (ra) which roughly translates as ‘What the Qur’an does not correct in the people, the Sultan (state) will by the sword (through power).”

    The problem that we have here in the UK is that it is the ‘state’ that is undermining its own laws that are there to protect minorities from being discriminated against. There was a general backlash against male Muslims after 9/11 and against ‘immigrants’ after the financial crisis in 2008 (which diverted attention away from the banks). However, as a Muslim woman who wears a face veil, I can pinpoint the exact moment that the demonisation of veiled Muslim women started and it was when Mr Jewish Cash for Questions Jack Straw made the comment about feeling uncomfortable sitting in front of his constituent who wore a face veil.

    As a niqaabi, I have never expected anyone who is not a Muslim to accommodate my needs especially pertaining to segregation. For many years, I have always attempted to carry out any studying, training, work and work experience in female only environments and with female instructors so that my face veil is not an issue that anyone needs to worry about. In 2006 I attempted to do some voluntary work and some training. One lady who I was dealing with was extremely polite and helpful, more than she needed to be, but within a week of Jack straw making his comments her attitude towards me had completely changed, to such an extent that I left. Another organisation felt emboldened by Jack Straw’s comments to unfairly offer my placement to someone else. Maybe it was the prayers of all the oppressed sisters that resulted in Jack Straw’s humiliation, disgrace and removal from public life.

    To me, these examples show what these people secretly harboured in their hearts and how only the fear of the law prevented them from revealing to me how they really felt. However, what hope is there when the law makers (like Boris Johnson with his ‘letterbox’ comment) are the ones who need restraining?

  2. Maashaallah brother. Social media, amongst other forms of media are the cancer of communication, the hotbed of propaganda, ignorance, hatred and division crippling today’s world.
    May Allah be with us and guide us all to the right pathand and protect us from evil.
    Assalamoualaikoum.

  3. Personally I feel that social media is the biggest factor in normalising racism and division. OK we have a colonial past and now we have the Brexit farce. But the far right is growing across Europe in counties which have a very different history. Social media is normalising hatred on a huge scale and across continents.
    When I became Muslim many moons ago my family had no problem with my choice. But in the last 10 years it has become a problem, with close members of my family propagating and sharing anti Muslim posts online. These actions are not harmless there will inevitably be a victim as a result of spreading this type of hate, no doubt some defenceless sister in hijab/niqab. When it came to my attention as I’m not on FB and I confronted them, they tried to justify their actions. I’ve since cut ties with them, sign of the times, it’s just a sad reality that this anti Muslim hatred is now pretty mainstream.
    The people do not have to like you or be pleased with you, if Allah Ta’ala is pleased with you, you’re a winner! And as for the far right I don’t think this problem is going away anytime soon.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

x

Check Also

Brexit – an inevitable disaster

Dr. Abdul Wahid argues that the political disasters we are witnessing today are inherent in the reigning secular political creeds

Unscripted #18 | Veteran Imam Shakeel Begg opens up

Join us this week on our Unscripted podcast with Imam Shakeel Begg

Donate / Subscribe

Send this to a friend