MUHARRAM
Home / News / Landmark Uyghur Tribunal geared to hear introductory statements today
Alexandros Michailidis / Shutterstock

Landmark Uyghur Tribunal geared to hear introductory statements today

In order to follow the day’s events, organisers of the tribunal have set up a live stream, which can be viewed here.

In response to atrocities being committed by the Chinese state against several Muslim minority groups, a groundbreaking people’s tribunal will convene today, where the first series of hearings will be heard by a UK-based panel. The tribunal will probe available information regarding the “alleged genocide and crimes against humanity against Uyghur, Kazakh and other Turkic Muslim populations” being perpetrated by the Chinese Community Party (CCP) in East Turkestan, which is referred to as Xinjiang province by the Chinese leadership. [1]

The tribunal’s roots can be traced all the way back last year to June 2020, when the notion was formally recommended by Dolkun Isa, President of the World Uyghur Congress, to the veteran barrister Sir Geoffrey Nice QC. Nice was asked to chair and investigate the “ongoing atrocities and possible Genocide” against the minority Muslim populations in East Turkestan. As a response to these pleas, the eagerly anticipated Uyghur Tribunal was officially launched on September 3rd of 2020. [2]




The pioneering nine-person commission – comprised of a number of senior human rights experts and UK-based lawyers – is set to delve into the murky waters of China’s oppressive and ongoing genocidal acts towards the Muslim minorities residing in the region of East Turkestan. The charges presented are grave, and include mass rape and murder, the forced sterilisation of women, and slave labour to name but a few. [3] [4] [5] [6]

As the panel’s website states:

“The Tribunal is assessing allegations that the PRC is responsible for the crime of genocide against the Uyghurs, Kazakhs and other Turkic Muslim populations and/or crimes against humanity arising from consideration of the prohibited acts of genocide. Alleged prohibited acts include killings, serious bodily or mental harm including sexual violence, conditions of life calculated to destroy, measures intended to restrict births and/or forcible transfer of Uyghur children from their parents to other groups.” [7]

Unsurprisingly, China has desperately scrambled to denounce the tribunal before it has even commenced, which is indicative of the damage and humiliation the yet to be disclosed evidence is likely to inflict. Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian claimed last week that the commission is a sham trial, suggesting:

“It is not even a real tribunal or special court, but only a special machine producing lies … It was founded by people with ulterior motives and carries no weight or authority. It is just a clumsy public opinion show under the guise of law.” [8]

However, the decision to investigate China through this tribunal was not an accident. For a long period, traditional legal routes to hold China to account – such as the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) – have been theoretically and practically blocked due to a sense of unwillingness by major world powers to upset the Chinese government. As a non-conventional alternative, this non-binding yet powerful people’s tribunal will hopefully garner further international support and raise awareness to the plight of Turkic minorities suffering under Beijing’s genocidal rule.

The chair of the tribunal, Sir Geoffrey Nice QC, has decades of experience in the British and international legal systems. He prominently led the trial of the former and now deceased Butcher of the Balkans, former Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic. Besides leading Milosevic’s case through the years 1998–2006, Nice has subsequently worked hand-in-hand with the International Criminal Court. [9]

While the Uyghur Tribunal will be based in London, overall, the United Kingdom has been one of the slower countries in declaring the Chinese oppression of the Turkic minorities as being a genocide. However, there has been recent progress in the form of a parliamentary motion, which was successfully passed in April and hailed by Sir Iain Duncan Smith as a “a historic moment.” [10]

In addition, whilst speaking during the debate, Nusrat Ghani MP said, “All five criteria of genocide are evidenced as taking place in Xinjiang.” At the time, the Conservative member for Wealden also warned that countless prisoners were being subjected to “brutal torture methods, including beatings with metal prods, electric shocks and whips.” [10]

Around the world, the global stance on the calamitous situation of the Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslim minorities in East Turkestan has been palpable. With the UK’s Westminster parliament now in agreement that China is committing genocide, and immediately after similar statements from countries such as the Netherlands, the US, and Canada were issued as well, the people’s tribunal is set to further galvanise popular support for the pursuance of justice for the Uyghurs, Kazakhs, and all other Turkic Muslim populations in East Turkestan. [11] [12] [13]

With the first of many hearings taking place today, the second session of hearings will be held in September, with a final judgement envisaged to be reached by the end of 2021 or early 2022, depending on any potential disruptions from the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic.

Source: www.islam21c.com

Notes:

[1] https://uyghurtribunal.com/

[2] https://www.rfa.org/english/news/uyghur/tribunal-09032020170056.html

[3] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/dec/15/xinjiang-china-more-than-half-a-million-forced-to-pick-cotton-report-finds

[4] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-55794071

[5] https://www.varsity.co.uk/interviews/19990

[6] https://apnews.com/article/269b3de1af34e17c1941a514f78d764c

[7] https://uyghurtribunal.com/frequently-asked-questions/

[8] https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20210604-uyghur-tribunal-to-convene-over-abuses-as-china-fumes

[9] https://uyghurtribunal.com/who-we-are/

[10] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-56843368

[11] https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-55723522

[12] https://www.islam21c.com/news-views/canadian-parliament-agrees-uyghur-oppression-amounts-to-genocide/

[13] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-netherlands-china-uighurs-idUSKBN2AP2CI

About Shaheer Choudhury

Shaheer is a regular news writer for Islam21c. Alongside this position, he also currently works as a casework coordinator at the UK-wide charity, HHUGS. He maintains a strong interest in politics and current affairs, and on the varying worldwide situations of Muslim communities. Prior to working for Islam21c, he developed a number of years' experience in the health and social care sector, and has previously volunteered at the Muslim Youth Helpline.

One comment

  1. I managed to catch the end of the tribunal live, when they were interviewing the Uyghar female nurse. I just want to say that I feel really sad for her as well as embarrassed. With all the years of experience, you would think that Sir Geoffrey Nice QC would understand that they were interviewing a middle-aged woman in the health and care profession not someone from the legal profession or the corporate world. I understand that they have to keep things moving but he could have done that without appearing both cold and cocky. He also cast doubt on the competence of the interpreter when he said that it seemed like the interpreter and the nurse were having a dialogue instead of him just interpreting the questions and the answers, when he was in fact guiding her back towards answering the question!

    Is this what you brothers think we should be getting excited about? Is this where you think our honour lies? If that nurse was the older sister, wife or mother of any of you, you would feel hurt for her to have to sit in front of such people, being humiliated by them.

    I’m not here to argue for or against using means like tribunals and demonstrations. Like the Uyghar brother said in his interview before the tribunal, they would prefer for it to be in a Muslim country but they don’t have that support. The issue is complicated but what I do understand is that although our beloved prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) accepted the intervention of the small group of Quraysh idol worshippers who helped put and end to the devastating 3 year boycott of the Muslims in Makkah (which they did on humanitarian grounds) the Muslims didn’t rejoice about their help to such an extent that they lost sight of their goal, which was to stand on their own two feet by establishing their own state so that, in the future, they wouldn’t need such help and intervention.

    However, I have heard Uyghur and non-Uyghur activists talk about how they look at the solution to the injustice and genocide from a humanitarian perspective, putting all their hopes in organisations like the UN, but our beloved prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) taught us through his words and actions that “The Imaam is but a shield (protection) behind whom you fight and you protect yourself with…”

    Not only are these activists putting all their eggs in one basket but, by the language that some of them are using, they are belittling what an Imaam or Amir is and failing to understand the tremendous impact having one can have on the security of the Muslim ummah (IF the ummah support him-remember, water can float a boat but also overturn it but our ummah can’t see that floating it is in our interests more than overturning it).

    Imaam An-Nawawi said about the interpretation of the above hadeeth:
    “‘The Imaam is a shield’ means like a barricade, because he prevents the enemy from harming the Muslims, and he prevents the people from wronging each other (or being unjust to each other), and he protects the principles and foundations of Islam. The people fear him and fear his might. ‘Behind whom you fight’, means that you fight the disbelievers, the tyrants, the Khawaarij (a deviant sect), and all the corrupt people with him. ‘You protect yourself with’ means against the evil of the enemy, the corrupt people, and the unjust people.”

    Essentially, all that this ummah is doing is kicking the can down the road but one day we need to face the fact that the Imaam is who our beloved prophet encouraged us to put our hopes in and is our only real protection. If this is not our area of expertise or in our ability then, at the very least, we should not hinder those whose area it is. Being the Imaam or Amir of the Muslim ummah is not a title to be envied or fought over but a responsibility to be shouldered and feel apprehensive about. Also, who would even eagerly accept it when doing so is like signing your own death warrant as it gets a multi million dollar bounty put on your head and, in our current times, is a thankless task, unlike being a left wing protestor for Palestine or a faasiq celebrity, who many Muslims are falling over themselves to thank.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Send this to a friend