• News
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Podcast
  • Campaigns
    • Stand4Uyghurs
    • In Their Shoes
  • Prayer
  • Members
  • Donate
  • More
    • About Us
    • Advertise Your Business
    • Contact
    • Jobs
    • Submit an Article
    • Subscribe
    • Write
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube WhatsApp Telegram
Islam21c
  • News
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Podcast
  • Campaigns
    • Stand4Uyghurs
    • In Their Shoes
  • Prayer
  • Members
  • Donate
  • More
    • About Us
    • Advertise Your Business
    • Contact
    • Jobs
    • Submit an Article
    • Subscribe
    • Write
0 Shopping Cart
Islam21c
Home»Special»Web Posts»New anti-Semitism definition + Prevent training = Palestine talk banned at university

New anti-Semitism definition + Prevent training = Palestine talk banned at university

Web Posts 23/02/20171 Comment2 Mins ReadBy Editor

New antisemitism definition has been used as a reason to prohibit a Palestinian rights talk at a UK university

Vocal support for Palestine.

Opposition to Israeli settlements in Gaza.

Criticisms of wars in the Middle East.

These are just some of a list of views that “may be regarded as extremist” according to revised Prevent training material for universities, revealed yesterday by Simon Hooper in the Middle East Eye.[1] The revelation came in the wake of the University of Central Lancashire (UCLan) cancelling an event organised by a Friends of Palestine society.

The event was due to host Middle East Eye contributor Ben White, entitled “Debunking misconceptions on Palestine and the importance of BDS [Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement],” as part of the national Israeli Apartheid Week, where universities across the globe are expected to raise awareness of what some call the world’s last remaining apartheid state.

Although critics of Prevent have long expected the circle of inexpressible opinion (called “extremism”) to eventually grow to include more and more forms of activism,[2] what has surprised some is that the government’s recent redefinition of “anti-Semitism” seems already to have been used to stifle pro-Palestinian rights activists, within just weeks of adoption.[3]


Also read: Summary of Our Legal Case Against Prevent


  • Helps complete development and release our brand new website where all the above happens
  • Helps run National Khutbah days with 100s of Imams reaching 100,000s on Jummah highlighting social issues
  • Helps produce Unscripted podcast shows with global influential figures tackling todays challenges
  • Helps produce Unscripted podcast shows with global influential scholars and activists tackling today's challenges
  • Helps research featured articles by leading scholars/activists offering guidance and solutions
  • Helps write NewsViews articles setting our narrative to major breaking stories
  • By proceeding, you will be added to the Islam21c mailing list. Your data is safe with us and will be protected in accordance with our data protection policy.
  • £ 0.00
  • per month
  • NOTE: Donating Zakat? Please proceed to our Zakat applicable emergency appeal here.
  • Donation Top Up

    Are you trying to increase your Rizq? Did you know by increasing your donation right now, Allah promises to give you back MUCH MORE
  • Helps write NewsViews articles setting our narrative to major breaking stories
  • Helps research featured articles by leading scholars/activists offering guidance and solutions
  • Helps produce Unscripted podcast shows with global influential scholars and activists tackling today's challenges
  • Helps produce Unscripted podcast shows with global influential figures tackling todays challenges
  • Helps run National Khutbah days with 100s of Imams reaching 100,000s on Jummah highlighting social issues
  • Helps complete development and release our brand new website where all the above happens



The new definition of anti-Semitism now includes “claiming that the existence of a state of Israel is a racist endeavour.”[4] As a result, UCLan said in a statement,

“We believe the proposed talk contravenes the new definition and furthermore breaches university protocols for such events, where we require assurances of a balanced view or a panel of speakers representing all interests.”

“In this instance our procedures determined that the proposed event would not be lawful and therefore it will not proceed as planned.”

Although many including the National Union of Students (NUS) and the University and College Union (UCU) have spoken out against Prevent’s silencing of some people and shutting down debate, revised Prevent training from the authorities appears to have already absorbed the new definition of anti-Semitism and incorporated it into problematising criticism of “Israel”. A screenshot from a Prevent training presentation shows “a list of views that may be regarded as extremist but are not illegal”:[5]

[donationbanner]


Source: www.islam21c.com

Notes:

[1] http://thejusticegap.com/2016/12/government-developed-taste-arbitrarily-restricting-free-speech/

[2] http://thejusticegap.com/2016/12/government-developed-taste-arbitrarily-restricting-free-speech/

[3] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/dec/28/britain-definition-antisemitism-british-jews-jewish-people

[4] http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/britain-adopt-controversial-definition-anti-semitism-stop-hate-crimes-353654024

[5] http://www.safecampuscommunities.ac.uk/

APARTHEID ISRAEL PALESTINE PALESTINIAN PREVENT RACISM ZIONISM
Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Telegram WhatsApp
Previous Article“Democratic Subversion” of the Henry Jackson Society
Next Article New study shows fasting could reverse diabetes

Related Posts

Government accused of illegal meddling in investigation

26/01/2023

Türkiye livid at “vile attack” on Qur’ān in Sweden

21/01/2023

BBC series renews focus on bigot Modi’s rise to political peak

19/01/2023

Ukrainian arms firms propping up genocidal Myanmar regime

17/01/2023

Major report on British Muslims in civil society launched

16/01/2023

Ugandan Muslims brace for enhanced monitoring of madrasas

15/01/2023
View 1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Abu Saalih on 03/05/2017 12:51 pm

    “..Israel’s violent birth callously required the destruction of a whole nation – one with a unique history, language, culture and collective memory. Therefore, the Palestinian people had to be wiped out to quell any possible sense of Israeli guilt, shame and legal and moral responsibility for what had befallen millions of a dispossessed people..”

    http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2017/04/israel-violent-birth-destroyed-palestine-170424114255909.html

    Reply

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Editor
Islam21c
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Telegram
© 2023 Islam21c.com | All rights reserved

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

close-link
.