• News
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Podcast
  • Campaigns
    • Stand4Uyghurs
    • In Their Shoes
  • Prayer
  • Members
  • Donate
  • More
    • About Us
    • Advertise Your Business
    • Contact
    • Jobs
    • Submit an Article
    • Subscribe
    • Write
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube WhatsApp Telegram
Islam21c
  • News
  • Articles
  • Videos
  • Podcast
  • Campaigns
    • Stand4Uyghurs
    • In Their Shoes
  • Prayer
  • Members
  • Donate
  • More
    • About Us
    • Advertise Your Business
    • Contact
    • Jobs
    • Submit an Article
    • Subscribe
    • Write
0 Shopping Cart
Islam21c
Home»News»Court rules insulting the Prophet ﷺ is not free speech

Court rules insulting the Prophet ﷺ is not free speech

News 26/10/2018No Comments3 Mins ReadBy Abdullah Izzadin
Photo: Marian Weyo / Shutterstock.com

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled this week that insulting the Prophet ﷺ could not be justified under the pretext of exercising the right to free speech. An unnamed Austrian woman, known as Mrs S, was convicted in February 2011 and fined €480 for inflammatory remarks made during two seminars which she held some years earlier.

Not satisfied with the court’s ruling, she filed an appeal with the Vienna Court of Appeal that December, only to lose her case there as well. She continued to lodge appeals; losing in the Supreme Court in December 2013 and then finally at highest court in Europe, the ECHR, this week.[1]

The 47-year old woman had based her fight on Article 10 (Freedom of Expression) throughout her case, but the court ruled:

“Mrs. S. appealed but the Vienna Court of Appeal upheld the decision in December 2011, confirming, in essence, the lower court’s findings. A request for the renewal of the proceedings was dismissed by the Supreme Court on 11 December 2013.”

“Relying on Article 10 (freedom of expression), Mrs. S. complained that the domestic courts failed to address the substance of the impugned statements in the light of her right to freedom of expression.”[2]

The panel of seven judges said in their ruling:


  • Helps complete development and release our brand new website where all the above happens
  • Helps run National Khutbah days with 100s of Imams reaching 100,000s on Jummah highlighting social issues
  • Helps produce Unscripted podcast shows with global influential figures tackling todays challenges
  • Helps produce Unscripted podcast shows with global influential scholars and activists tackling today's challenges
  • Helps research featured articles by leading scholars/activists offering guidance and solutions
  • Helps write NewsViews articles setting our narrative to major breaking stories
  • By proceeding, you will be added to the Islam21c mailing list. Your data is safe with us and will be protected in accordance with our data protection policy.
  • £ 0.00
  • per month
  • NOTE: Donating Zakat? Please proceed to our Zakat applicable emergency appeal here.
  • Donation Top Up

    Are you trying to increase your Rizq? Did you know by increasing your donation right now, Allah promises to give you back MUCH MORE
  • Helps write NewsViews articles setting our narrative to major breaking stories
  • Helps research featured articles by leading scholars/activists offering guidance and solutions
  • Helps produce Unscripted podcast shows with global influential scholars and activists tackling today's challenges
  • Helps produce Unscripted podcast shows with global influential figures tackling todays challenges
  • Helps run National Khutbah days with 100s of Imams reaching 100,000s on Jummah highlighting social issues
  • Helps complete development and release our brand new website where all the above happens


“The Court found in particular that the domestic courts comprehensively assessed the wider context of the applicant’s statements and carefully balanced her right to freedom of expression with the right of others to have their religious feelings protected, and served the legitimate aim of preserving religious peace in Austria.”

“It held that by considering the impugned statements as going beyond the permissible limits of an objective debate, and by classifying them as an abusive attack on the Prophet of Islam which could stir up prejudice and threaten religious peace, the domestic courts put forward relevant and sufficient reasons.”[3]

She was ordered to pay the fine as well as legal fees.

Austria is considered to be one of the most Islamophobic countries in Europe at present. The right-wing coalition came to power by promising to deal with the migrant crisis and stirring up anti-Muslim sentiment.[4]

Only in June this year, the chancellor Sebastian Kurz shut down seven mosques and expelled up to 60 imams, invoking the usual racist dog whistles of “parallel societies, political Islam and radicalisation”.[5]

The court’s decision follows common sense and decency, yet will undoubtedly upset many on the far-right and so-called “liberals” that routinely appeal to “free speech” to spread falsehoods and attack disadvantaged minorities—ironically the very objectives for the introduction of free speech laws in the first place.

  • Also read:
    • Freedom of speech is an ideological construct
    • Freedom of Speech Must Go Hand in Hand with the Spirit of Tolerance

[donationbanner]


Source: www.islam21c.com

Notes:

[1] https://www.yenisafak.com/en/world/echr-rules-insulting-prophet-muhammad-not-covered-by-freedom-of-expression-3464507

[2] https://www.dailysabah.com/europe/2018/10/25/insulting-prophet-muhammad-not-free-speech-ecthr-rules

[3] https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng-press#{%22itemid%22:[%22003-6234980-8105265%22]}

[4] https://www.islam21c.com/news-views/austria-shuts-7-mosques-and-expels-dozens-of-muslim-imams-in-latest-inquisition/

[5] https://www.islam21c.com/news-views/austria-shuts-7-mosques-and-expels-dozens-of-muslim-imams-in-latest-inquisition/#_ftn5

COURT ECHR EU EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE FREEDOM FREEDOM OF SPEECH NV1440 PROPHET (Ṣallāhu 'alayhi wa sallam) PROPHET MUHAMMAD (Ṣallāhu 'alayhi wa sallam)
Share. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Telegram WhatsApp
Previous ArticleIblis is not an equal to Allah
Next Article Psychology of the Mother-in-Law

Related Posts

Government accused of illegal meddling in investigation

26/01/2023

Türkiye livid at “vile attack” on Qur’ān in Sweden

21/01/2023

BBC series renews focus on bigot Modi’s rise to political peak

19/01/2023

Ukrainian arms firms propping up genocidal Myanmar regime

17/01/2023

Major report on British Muslims in civil society launched

16/01/2023

Ugandan Muslims brace for enhanced monitoring of madrasas

15/01/2023
Add A Comment

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Abdullah Izzadin
Islam21c
Facebook Twitter Instagram YouTube Telegram
© 2023 Islam21c.com | All rights reserved

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

close-link
.