• Campaigns
    • POMW
    • Guarding Innocence
    • Palestine Truth
    • Hold On
  • Articles
  • Podcast
  • More
    • About
    • Careers
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    • Submit
    • Subscribe
Be a Guardian
Islam21cIslam21c
  • Campaigns
  • Articles
  • Podcast
  • More
Search
  • Campaigns
    • POMW
    • Guarding Innocence
    • Palestine Truth
    • Hold On
  • Articles
  • Podcast
  • More
    • About
    • Careers
    • Advertise
    • Contact
    • Submit
    • Subscribe

Stay Updated

Stay updated to receive the latest from Islam21c

Subscribe
Made by ThemeRuby using the Foxiz theme Powered by WordPress

Court criticises Ofsted for penalising Islamic school over gender segregation

By Editor 11 Saf 38 ◦︎ 11 Nov 16

A high court judge has ruled that Ofsted inspectors were wrong to penalise an Islamic faith school because of their “erroneous” view that segregation of boys and girls amounted to unlawful discrimination.

But Mr Justice Jay allowed Ofsted, the body that regulates schools in England, to publish the rest of its inspection report placing the school into special measures, after inspectors found books in the school library that gave tacit approval to domestic violence.

Ofsted’s original inspection report was withheld after the school – which cannot be named – won an injunction arguing that publication would cause it “widespread and irreparable damage”.

In his judgment, Jay was critical of Ofsted’s claims that segregation by sex in faith schools would inevitably lead to discrimination. “Given that both girls and boys are denied the same opportunity of interaction with the opposite sex, it would be artificial to hold that each group has been discriminated against, in the sense of receiving treatment less favourable than the other. There is no evidence in this case that segregation particularly disadvantages women,” he said.

Three previous Ofsted inspections of the school failed to find fault over its policy of segregation. During the court hearing, Ofsted argued that separation by sex would “reinforce notions of inferiority within the female gender”.

The court rejected the school’s claim that it had been unfairly targeted after a visit by Sir Michael Wilshaw, the chief inspector of schools. The ruling found that Ofsted would still have rated the school as inadequate “on the discovery of offensive books in the library and the failings in relation to safeguarding”.

Wilshaw said Ofsted would appeal against the ruling, saying he was “disappointed that the court has determined that the practice of completely segregating boys and girls in this publicly funded mixed-sex school does not amount to unlawful discrimination. I do not believe that segregating children without an educational reason is in their best educational interests.”

Wilshaw was previously a headteacher of St Bonaventure’s, a Catholic boys’ school in east London, with girls admitted to the sixth form.

The judgment said: “The only basis for holding that segregation between the sexes reinforces notions of inferiority within the female gender is by contending, and then establishing, that this is, in effect, why Islamic schools in particular or faith schools in general carry out the practice. But Ofsted has not made that argument, and there is no evidence to that effect.”

Jay said Islamic faiths schools were similar to some Jewish schools in this respect. “Indeed, there is evidence before me of a particular Jewish school, operating on what is described as two campuses, which at its last Ofsted inspection in 2012 was rated outstanding across the board,” the judge noted. “From brief internet research, I have gathered that a number of Christian faith schools have similar practices.”

He said placing the school in special measures was justified because books in the school library “contained views which are inimical to fundamental British values” in Ofsted’s view. The books claimed that a wife is not allowed to refuse sex to her husband and that women are “commanded to obey their husbands and fulfil their domestic duties”, according to the ruling. They also gave tacit approval to a husband beating his wife, “provided that this is not done ‘harshly’”.

Jay said: “In my judgment it is obvious that leaders at the school conspicuously failed in allowing these books to enter, or re-enter, the library, and the report’s assessment to that effect cannot be impugned.”

[donationbanner]


Published by The Guardian

Editor 11 Saf 38 ◦︎ 11 Nov 16 12 Saf 38 ◦︎ 12 Nov 16
Share This Article
Copy Link
Previous Article Home Office confirms Prevent strategy to be reinforced
Next Article Moazzam Begg: “How to Really Defeat Violent Extremism”
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

New resources released for schools to tackle Islamophobia

News News Web Posts

Trump learns from Arab regimes how to ban Muslim organisations

News News News Middle East Web Posts

243 academics complain of “outrageous interferences with free expression” at universities

News News News United Kingdom Web Posts

Why the world needs to remember Sir Gerald Kaufman

News News Web Posts
Show More
Facebook Youtube Instagram Telegram Whatsapp

© 2026 Islam21c | All rights reserved

Work with us

Whether you want to volunteer or be a part of our team, there are ways you can always make a contribution to the Muslim Ummah.

View vacancies

Stay connected!

We know how it feels to miss out on the latest breaking stories, exciting project announcements, and multimedia productions, so here is this handy box to make sure you don’t miss a thing! Signing up takes just 10 seconds.

Subscribe
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?