Yesterday Katie Hopkins let loose a barrage of Tweets which disseminated some of the most vulgar, ill-founded, openly abusive, and unprovoked commentary a public personality ever has. Though one may try to argue freedom of expression in her defence, it is important to remember that such a freedom is not an absolute right and definitely has its limits on the fringes of what constitutes criminal conduct.
“Palestinians busy knifing Israelis. 2 state solution my a***. Filthy rodents burrowing beneath Israel. time to restart the bombing campaign.”
In addressing the first allegation, it is fair to draw attention to recent events in Israel:
- Video footage of an unarmed and retreating Palestinian man shot dead by Israeli police has been publicly uploaded.[1]
- Israeli settlers set fire inside a mosque in the Palestinian village of Al-Mughayyir near Ramallah earlier today.[2]
- An Israeli settler in the West Bank deliberately ran over two 5-year-old girls (killing one, injuring the other) while they were returning home from Kindergarten.[3]
- A Palestinian-American boy was shot by the IDF in the West Bank, then intentionally left to bleed out (by being denied any possibility of medical intervention from bystanders) until dead.
- F16 Jets are once more soaring above Gaza at dangerous heights.
- Al-Aqsa mosque was closed, then systematically trashed.[4]
These are only a few of the atrocities committed by Israel within the restrained time-period of the past month. They do not justify the stabbing, however it is important to differentiate between individual actions attributed to an individual and actions committed by State actors. The first would under no circumstances warrant a sweeping generalisation, but the latter could arguably be constituted as an action condoned by said State or its people.
Clearly, Katie’s referenced event is an individual’s crime, whether provoked or not. Can the same be said for the institutional violence indiscriminately witnessed by, and targeted at Palestinians in that same time-frame (from apartheid, to disenfranchisement)?[5] [6]
With regard to the two-state solution and its relationship to Katie Hopkins’ backside, it would be reasonable to conclude that Israel has treated it with the same respect. The UN General Assembly, Security Council, International Court of Justice, High Contracting Parties of the Geneva Convention, and the Red Cross all consider that the Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are illegal under international law; they are in direct contravention to the two-state solution set out by the United Nations, and the Fourth Geneva Convention.
Hence, we see a clear and unfortunate correlation between the parameters of Katie’s backside, and Israel’s.
The “filthy rodents” comment comes not only as an appalling insult to a method of living in strenuous conditions (contrary to popular belief, Hamas are not the only ones who use the tunnels), an inaccurate perception of their geography (the tunnels are in fact predominantly under Gaza), and a racially discriminant remark, but it is also quite easily an anti-Semitic remark as it deems the celebrated Polish Jews of the Warsaw Ghetto uprising who built tunnels and used the sewer system in order to smuggle food and weapons as “filthy rodents” within the same context- in fact, Palestinians are Semitic people, so it seems Hopkins herself fits quite well into any of either a modern or historic anti-Semitic outfit.
The closing sentence is an unfortunate public incitement of violent and potentially lethal action to thousands (as I am sure is Katie’s goal). Unfortunately, under International law, restarting a “bombing campaign” in response to an individual act by a non-State agent would be grossly and blatantly disproportionate (with no route for justification) and would see Katie’s favourite country on a swift road down a multitude of international sanctions.
“The police are singing down the same hymn sheet. Mohammed is going DAAAAAN. Allahu Akbar.”
In deciphering this tweet, and I hope I have done so correctly, I am assuming the police (in a certain TV show) had made a possibly fortunate move, and Hopkins is celebrating by proclaiming the criminal is going “down”. The flagrant offence she attempts to cause, and active partisanship shown through a mere 89 characters is not only in contravention to basic moral conduct, but also various UK laws, with particular regard to harassment, discrimination, hate speech, and abuse, especially when balanced in proportion to her celebrity platform and foreseeable reach.
However, to facilitate Katie with a feeling of success in such a contrived attempt at this point would be an insult to any conception of avid responsibility. In the end, I can only praise Katie’s attempt at Arabic by declaring her belief that “God is great”- maybe we can expect the Shahādah next?
“Father beats his daughter with an iron bar. But he is a good Muslim, prays in his cell & attends mosque. So that’s all happy days then.”
The deep-rooted sarcasm and implicit nature of this tweet on the other hand, when read in relation to her snub remarks in The Sun, cannot be overlooked. Katie seems to think that:
- Muslim crimes are overlooked in favour of their “good behaviour”.
- Muslims are violent criminals.
- Our national measures against “Islamist violence” is purportedly not enough.
1. The pretext for inciting hatred here is ridiculous. If anything, the assertion is a paradox within itself; claiming to be a “good/ devout Muslim” in the current climate of affairs is more likely to be interpreted as “bad behaviour” than any mitigating factor for public opinion.
2. Alcohol is a factor in 40% of all crimes in the UK – alcohol faces a blanket prohibition in Islām;[8] of course this in no way contends that those who drink are a criminal threat nor that all “Muslims” do not drink, but it does immediately rule out a large statistical possibility of criminal cases having any real relevance to “Islamist” involvement.
Mathematically, the world’s latest poster-boys for “Islamist extremism”, ISIS, number at a generously estimated 31,500 members.[9] Compared to 1.5 billion Muslims worldwide, this does not equate to even a mere 0.001% of the global Muslim community, so to perpetuate the notion that Islām is a violent collection of sworn enemies to the West by utilising baseless generalisations is nothing more than a sad display of bigotry.
3. This view seems to be quite popular among those like Katie. It is as if reading any of the UK’s consistently employed terrorism legislationand reforms would be far too intelligent to be practical.[10] In a nutshell, it is legislation with an extremely low threshold for powers of detention, conviction, or deportation, even occasionally resulting in miscarriages of justice or prolonged detentions with no charge.[11]
Also escaping notice is the number of cases brought by the UK government in tackling extremism,[12] with a contentious number of Muslims, mosques, and Islamic schools targeted on a daily basis. Perhaps the fact that innocent Muslims are 42 times more likely to be stopped for a ‘stop and search’ under counter-terrorism measures in an airport is not enough for Katie Hopkins,[13] her satisfaction would probably require prescribing a new set of Nuremberg Laws for Muslims in Britain.[14]
In conclusion, though Katie’s views are eloquently put, grammatically coherent, and substantially humanitarian, there seems to be some gaps in factual validity. I would recommend education outside the scope of a television set; actually going out and meeting or talking to a real-life Muslim would be a good start – in an airport perhaps, where we have all already been thoroughly searched and declared safe for human interaction.
[donationbanner]
Source: www.islam21c.com
Notes:
[2] http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=739391
[3] http://english.al-akhbar.com/node/22094
[6] http://www.cjpmo.org/DisplayDocument.aspx?DocumentID=219
[7] http://www.iiipublishing.com/blog/2014/07/blog_07_26_2014.html
[8] https://ncadd.org/learn-about-alcohol/alcohol-and-crime
[9] http://bigstory.ap.org/article/cia-islamic-state-group-has-31500-fightersers
[10] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cornwall-29892952
[13] http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/may/23/counter-terror-stop-search-minorities
[14] http://www.ushmm.org/outreach/en/article.php?ModuleId=10007695
9 Comments
MashaAllah excellent response to a dangerous combination of ignorant and vulgar comments by Katie Hopkins. I hope that she is cautioned by the authorities and more importantly educates herself and changes her ways.
Sorry to be pedantic but in the spirit of being factual, in reference to the estimate of ISIS members compared to the population of Muslims worldwide according to my calculation actually equates to 0.0021%.
I am very grateful for excellent reply of Rabah. We insaAllah should not be worried. I hope she reads the Rabah’s response and get worried for herself. May Allah SWT gives her hidaya.
EXCELLENT REPLY. I HOPE THAT THE INTERNATIONAL HAS READ HER TWEET AND I EXPECT AN ACTION AGAINST HER FOR THIS INSTIGATING TWEET. BECAUSE IF THE MUSLIMS REACT NEGATIVELY NOW, WE BECOME TERRORISTS WHEREAS PROVOCATIVE STATEMENT IS BEING MADE AGAINST US AND OUR RELIGION/NOBLE BOOK – ALQUR’AN KAREEM.
What Allah SWT has ordained InsaAllah will happen. The religion of Allah “Islam” will take over the whole world. No need to worry about this small foul mouth creature or temporary irritation.
Why give this waste of a space a platform. I would have just ignored the lewd comments. She’s not worthy of the time or energy wasted. She needs to watch herself on tv and take a grip.
Hi Louise,
Your concerns are well-put. Allow me to respond, and possibly explain the need of response.
What motivated me to address her ridiculous nonsense is not her public platform, nor even any feeling of offence. It is rather the convoluted response I saw in articles by a range of commentators. It seems when someone says something like what she does, it is an opening of Pandora’s box, and all of a sudden all hatred, racism, and violence (even when completely based on ignorance) becomes a fair free for all and under the legitimised pretext of “saying what no one else will”.
Hence the categoric way of addressing every assumption arising from Katie’s lovely contributions to society; so that the undercover bigots remain undercover, and do not taint us with their convictions that she “is telling the truth”.
In summary: this is more a response which addresses many (regardless of Katie’s tweets) overwhelmingly inaccurate and prejudiced views held by a lot of the general public; this instance merely helped flush them out, phrase them as propositions, and then undermine each one categorically with objective fact and evidence.
I could not care less what Katie personally thinks. However, addressing ignorance where it protrudes is a duty we all have- especially when such ignorance can be utilised as backlash against complete innocents.
I do see your point though, in regard to her resilient attempts to grab the spotlight in the most ridiculous and desperate of ways!
Excellent response to someone that should have known better or should have made some effort to research the true picture, and not blindly rubber stamp Israeli occupation and terrorism
Thank you for writing such a profoundly well worded article with reference to what I would call akin to Hate preaching, albeit through social media. Social media is the lady’s soap box. It would be good if justice could be forthcoming, in that she is cautioned by authority, so those who had to endure injustice are reassured……I hope so, as someone who has had privilege, has highlighted her complete ignorance…to what actually happened, to not only what innocent victims in Palestine endured but also what the children have had to endure, watching their families being torn apart through the loss of family and friends.
Very well said Rabah, Katie Hopkins should be ashamed of her racial behaviour and outburst. God damn her!